PortfoliosLab logo
LQDI vs. FBND
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LQDI and FBND is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.2

Performance

LQDI vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
31.28%
19.30%
LQDI
FBND

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LQDI:

0.89

FBND:

1.34

Sortino Ratio

LQDI:

1.25

FBND:

1.96

Omega Ratio

LQDI:

1.16

FBND:

1.23

Calmar Ratio

LQDI:

0.56

FBND:

0.71

Martin Ratio

LQDI:

3.41

FBND:

3.88

Ulcer Index

LQDI:

1.74%

FBND:

1.88%

Daily Std Dev

LQDI:

6.67%

FBND:

5.42%

Max Drawdown

LQDI:

-28.99%

FBND:

-17.25%

Current Drawdown

LQDI:

-4.93%

FBND:

-3.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDI achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's 2.49% return.


LQDI

YTD

2.66%

1M

-0.19%

6M

1.13%

1Y

6.42%

5Y*

4.04%

10Y*

N/A

FBND

YTD

2.49%

1M

0.43%

6M

1.80%

1Y

7.96%

5Y*

0.63%

10Y*

2.19%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LQDI vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQDI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for FBND: current value is 0.36%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FBND: 0.36%
Expense ratio chart for LQDI: current value is 0.18%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
LQDI: 0.18%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LQDI vs. FBND — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQDI is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQDI is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQDI is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQDI is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQDI is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQDI is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FBND
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBND is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBND is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBND is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBND is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBND is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBND is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LQDI vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for LQDI, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
LQDI: 0.89
FBND: 1.34
The chart of Sortino ratio for LQDI, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
LQDI: 1.25
FBND: 1.96
The chart of Omega ratio for LQDI, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
LQDI: 1.16
FBND: 1.23
The chart of Calmar ratio for LQDI, currently valued at 0.56, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
LQDI: 0.56
FBND: 0.71
The chart of Martin ratio for LQDI, currently valued at 3.41, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
LQDI: 3.41
FBND: 3.88

The current LQDI Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDI and FBND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.89
1.34
LQDI
FBND

Dividends

LQDI vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

LQDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, less than FBND's 4.61% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LQDI
iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF
4.52%4.65%3.98%3.27%2.42%2.34%3.26%2.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
4.61%4.73%4.26%3.07%1.86%4.25%2.90%2.93%2.56%2.84%3.26%0.66%

Drawdowns

LQDI vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDI drawdown since its inception was -28.99%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDI and FBND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-7.00%-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-4.93%
-3.18%
LQDI
FBND

Volatility

LQDI vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 2.33%. This indicates that LQDI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
3.54%
2.33%
LQDI
FBND