PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LQDH vs. TIP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


LQDHTIP
YTD Return4.26%4.82%
1Y Return7.96%7.84%
3Y Return (Ann)4.44%-1.15%
5Y Return (Ann)4.30%2.59%
10Y Return (Ann)3.21%2.31%
Sharpe Ratio2.691.41
Daily Std Dev3.06%5.46%
Max Drawdown-24.63%-14.56%
Current Drawdown0.00%-5.03%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between LQDH and TIP is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

LQDH vs. TIP - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LQDH achieves a 4.26% return, which is significantly lower than TIP's 4.82% return. Over the past 10 years, LQDH has outperformed TIP with an annualized return of 3.21%, while TIP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.31% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
2.16%
6.08%
LQDH
TIP

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LQDH vs. TIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQDH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TIP's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


LQDH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF
Expense ratio chart for LQDH: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for TIP: current value at 0.19% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.19%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LQDH vs. TIP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LQDH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LQDH, currently valued at 2.69, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.69
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LQDH, currently valued at 4.06, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.004.06
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LQDH, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.54
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LQDH, currently valued at 4.53, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.53
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LQDH, currently valued at 17.69, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0017.69
TIP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TIP, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.41
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TIP, currently valued at 2.11, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.002.11
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TIP, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.25
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TIP, currently valued at 0.53, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.53
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TIP, currently valued at 6.70, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.006.70

LQDH vs. TIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQDH Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the TIP Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of LQDH and TIP.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
2.69
1.41
LQDH
TIP

Dividends

LQDH vs. TIP - Dividend Comparison

LQDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.55%, more than TIP's 2.72% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LQDH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF
8.55%7.69%3.73%1.65%2.22%3.09%5.08%2.37%2.33%2.98%2.19%0.00%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
2.72%2.73%6.96%4.28%1.17%1.75%2.71%2.07%1.48%0.34%1.67%1.15%

Drawdowns

LQDH vs. TIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDH drawdown since its inception was -24.63%, which is greater than TIP's maximum drawdown of -14.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDH and TIP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember0
-5.03%
LQDH
TIP

Volatility

LQDH vs. TIP - Volatility Comparison

iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) have volatilities of 1.01% and 1.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.40%0.60%0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%1.60%1.80%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.01%
1.01%
LQDH
TIP