LQDH vs. EMNT
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund (EMNT).
LQDH and EMNT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LQDH is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on May 27, 2014. EMNT is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 10, 2019.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LQDH or EMNT.
Key characteristics
| LQDH | EMNT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.61% | 4.38% |
| 1Y Return | 8.26% | 6.27% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 4.46% | 3.18% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.77 | 5.31 |
| Daily Std Dev | 3.06% | 1.19% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.63% | -2.28% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQDH and EMNT is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LQDH vs. EMNT - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LQDH having a 4.61% return and EMNT slightly lower at 4.38%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LQDH vs. EMNT - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQDH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EMNT's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LQDH vs. EMNT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund (EMNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LQDH vs. EMNT - Dividend Comparison
LQDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.52%, more than EMNT's 5.20% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 8.52% | 7.69% | 3.73% | 1.65% | 2.22% | 3.09% | 5.08% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.98% | 2.19% |
EMNT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund | 5.20% | 4.62% | 2.79% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LQDH vs. EMNT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQDH drawdown since its inception was -24.63%, which is greater than EMNT's maximum drawdown of -2.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDH and EMNT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LQDH vs. EMNT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) has a higher volatility of 0.98% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund (EMNT) at 0.18%. This indicates that LQDH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.