PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LQDA vs. ACWI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LQDA and ACWI is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

LQDA vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
71.33%
8.29%
LQDA
ACWI

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LQDA:

0.23

ACWI:

1.66

Sortino Ratio

LQDA:

0.69

ACWI:

2.27

Omega Ratio

LQDA:

1.11

ACWI:

1.30

Calmar Ratio

LQDA:

0.17

ACWI:

2.44

Martin Ratio

LQDA:

0.47

ACWI:

9.78

Ulcer Index

LQDA:

28.10%

ACWI:

2.02%

Daily Std Dev

LQDA:

56.48%

ACWI:

11.91%

Max Drawdown

LQDA:

-93.87%

ACWI:

-56.00%

Current Drawdown

LQDA:

-55.62%

ACWI:

-0.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDA achieves a 40.31% return, which is significantly higher than ACWI's 5.37% return.


LQDA

YTD

40.31%

1M

21.15%

6M

71.34%

1Y

15.75%

5Y*

26.56%

10Y*

N/A

ACWI

YTD

5.37%

1M

2.36%

6M

8.29%

1Y

20.04%

5Y*

10.99%

10Y*

9.55%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LQDA vs. ACWI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQDA is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQDA is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQDA is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQDA is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQDA is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQDA is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ACWI is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ACWI is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ACWI is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ACWI is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ACWI is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ACWI is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LQDA vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LQDA, currently valued at 0.23, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.231.66
The chart of Sortino ratio for LQDA, currently valued at 0.69, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.692.27
The chart of Omega ratio for LQDA, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.111.30
The chart of Calmar ratio for LQDA, currently valued at 0.17, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.172.44
The chart of Martin ratio for LQDA, currently valued at 0.47, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.479.78
LQDA
ACWI

The current LQDA Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDA and ACWI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.23
1.66
LQDA
ACWI

Dividends

LQDA vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

LQDA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LQDA
Liquidia Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.62%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.25%1.94%2.19%2.56%2.26%

Drawdowns

LQDA vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDA drawdown since its inception was -93.87%, which is greater than ACWI's maximum drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDA and ACWI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-55.62%
-0.26%
LQDA
ACWI

Volatility

LQDA vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) has a higher volatility of 8.62% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 2.86%. This indicates that LQDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
8.62%
2.86%
LQDA
ACWI
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab