PortfoliosLab logo
LQD vs. VCSH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LQD and VCSH is -0.40. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

LQD vs. VCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

LQD:

5.28%

VCSH:

2.27%

Max Drawdown

LQD:

-0.54%

VCSH:

-0.23%

Current Drawdown

LQD:

-0.54%

VCSH:

-0.19%

Returns By Period


LQD

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

VCSH

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LQD vs. VCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VCSH's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LQD vs. VCSH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQD is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQD is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQD is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQD is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQD is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQD is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

VCSH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VCSH is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VCSH is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VCSH is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VCSH is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VCSH is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VCSH is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LQD vs. VCSH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

LQD vs. VCSH - Dividend Comparison

LQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than VCSH's 4.13% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LQD vs. VCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQD drawdown since its inception was -0.54%, which is greater than VCSH's maximum drawdown of -0.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQD and VCSH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

LQD vs. VCSH - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...