PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOTBY vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOTBY vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lotus Bakeries NV (LOTBY) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOTBY achieves a 17.22% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 8.20% return.


LOTBY

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
17.22%
6M
17.22%
1Y
36.09%
3Y*
17.62%
5Y*
10Y*

IVV

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.20%
6M
7.25%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOTBY vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LOTBY
Lotus Bakeries NV
17.22%-18.87%70.33%12.91%-6.53%-6.72%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
8.20%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%3.59%

Correlation

The correlation between LOTBY and IVV is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOTBY vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOTBY
LOTBY Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
LOTBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOTBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOTBY Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
LOTBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOTBY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOTBY vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lotus Bakeries NV (LOTBY) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LOTBYIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.86

1.35

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

2.68

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.05

11.98

-7.93

LOTBY vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOTBY Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOTBY and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LOTBY vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOTBY drawdown since its inception was -47.12%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOTBY and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOTBYIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.12%

-55.25%

+8.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.21%

-8.89%

-9.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.12%

-18.75%

-28.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.22%

-3.14%

-24.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.60%

-10.76%

-3.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.97%

1.99%

+6.98%

Volatility

LOTBY vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lotus Bakeries NV (LOTBY) is 0.00%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that LOTBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOTBYIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

4.88%

-4.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.78%

9.85%

+15.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.76%

12.48%

+23.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.41%

16.98%

+20.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.41%

18.07%

+19.34%

Dividends

LOTBY vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

LOTBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than IVV's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.11%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%
LOTBY
Lotus Bakeries NV
1.05%0.97%0.57%0.75%0.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LOTBY and IVV have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVV has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to LOTBY (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOTBY dropped -47.12% vs IVV's -55.25%.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOTBY and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer