LOPE vs. URTH

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (LOPE) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH).

URTH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Jan 10, 2012.

Performance

LOPE vs. URTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (LOPE) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LOPE vs. URTH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LOPE Grand Canyon Education, Inc.	2.92%	1.53%	24.05%	24.97%	23.28%	-7.95%	-2.80%	-0.36%	7.38%	53.17%
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF	-2.13%	21.36%	18.66%	23.95%	-17.97%	22.27%	15.78%	28.15%	-8.56%	22.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOPE achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly higher than URTH's -2.13% return. Over the past 10 years, LOPE has outperformed URTH with an annualized return of 14.81%, while URTH has yielded a comparatively lower 12.17% annualized return.

LOPE

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 5.59%
• YTD: 2.92%
• 6M: -21.54%
• 1Y: -3.19%
• 3Y*: 14.54%
• 5Y*: 9.19%
• 10Y*: 14.81%

URTH

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: -4.40%
• YTD: -2.13%
• 6M: 0.51%
• 1Y: 20.24%
• 3Y*: 17.49%
• 5Y*: 10.46%
• 10Y*: 12.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LOPE vs. URTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOPE

LOPE Risk / Return Rank: 35
LOPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
LOPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
LOPE Omega Ratio Rank: 31
LOPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
LOPE Martin Ratio Rank: 40

URTH

URTH Risk / Return Rank: 68
URTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
URTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
URTH Omega Ratio Rank: 69
URTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
URTH Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOPE vs. URTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (LOPE) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LOPE	URTH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.10	1.17	-1.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.09	1.75	-1.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.26	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.03	1.74	-1.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.06	8.34	-8.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LOPE vs. URTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOPE Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the URTH Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOPE and URTH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LOPE	URTH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10	1.17	-1.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	0.65	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.71	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.68	-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between LOPE and URTH is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LOPE vs. URTH - Dividend Comparison

LOPE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LOPE Grand Canyon Education, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF	1.52%	1.48%	1.47%	1.70%	1.68%	1.50%	1.52%	2.16%	2.30%	1.88%	2.15%	2.35%

Drawdowns

LOPE vs. URTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOPE drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, which is greater than URTH's maximum drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOPE and URTH.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOPE	URTH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.81%	-34.01%	-20.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.62%	-11.85%	-19.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.13%	-26.05%	-13.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.81%	-34.01%	-20.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.39%	-5.49%	-16.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.60%	-4.42%	-13.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.79%	2.47%	+14.32%

Volatility

LOPE vs. URTH - Volatility Comparison

Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (LOPE) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) at 5.68%. This indicates that LOPE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LOPE	URTH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.54%	5.68%	+1.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.32%	9.53%	+14.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.84%	17.36%	+15.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.89%	16.16%	+13.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.83%	17.27%	+13.56%