PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOGI vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LOGI vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Logitech International SA (LOGI) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOGI achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly higher than META's -15.51% return. Over the past 10 years, LOGI has outperformed META with an annualized return of 19.76%, while META has yielded a comparatively lower 16.39% annualized return.


LOGI

1D
0.90%
1M
9.02%
6M
19.38%
YTD
2.26%
1Y
17.58%
3Y*
17.03%
5Y*
0.89%
10Y*
19.76%
ALL TIME*
15.77%

META

1D
3.28%
1M
-4.49%
6M
-22.16%
YTD
-15.51%
1Y
-25.53%
3Y*
20.28%
5Y*
9.53%
10Y*
16.39%
ALL TIME*
20.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$166.01M$134.03M$133.77M
$9.87B$11.79B$10.93B

LOGI vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LOGI
Logitech International SA
2.26%25.21%-10.58%55.03%-22.89%-14.29%107.75%52.51%-6.12%37.34%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-15.51%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%56.57%-25.71%53.38%

Correlation

The correlation between LOGI and META is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012

0.35

The correlation between LOGI and META shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LOGI:

$14.71B

META:

$1.42T

EPS

LOGI:

$5.42

META:

$26.51

PE Ratio

LOGI:

18.91

META:

21.00

PEG Ratio

LOGI:

1.38

META:

0.86

PS Ratio

LOGI:

3.07

META:

6.27

PB Ratio

LOGI:

6.32

META:

5.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

LOGI:

$4.92B

META:

$228.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LOGI:

$2.22B

META:

$186.59B

EBITDA (TTM)

LOGI:

$985.46M

META:

$107.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOGI vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LOGI
LOGI Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
LOGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOGI Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
LOGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOGI Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LOGI vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Logitech International SA (LOGI) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LOGIMETADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.89

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

-0.84

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.81

-1.52

+2.33

LOGI vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOGI Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOGI and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LOGI vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOGI drawdown since its inception was -80.58%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGI and META.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOGIMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.58%

-76.74%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.21%

-33.30%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.59%

-34.15%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.52%

-76.74%

+17.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.80%

-76.74%

+8.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.11%

-29.30%

+10.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.21%

-15.90%

-16.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.82%

18.25%

-1.43%

Volatility

LOGI vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Logitech International SA (LOGI) is 11.83%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 15.37%. This indicates that LOGI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOGIMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.83%

15.37%

-3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.98%

30.29%

-2.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.23%

39.78%

-3.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.65%

44.68%

-8.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.46%

39.10%

-3.64%

Dividends

LOGI vs. META - Dividend Comparison

LOGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than META's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LOGI
Logitech International SA
3.10%3.17%3.32%1.12%1.57%1.14%0.58%1.03%1.43%1.23%2.29%2.28%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.38%0.32%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LOGI vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Logitech International SA and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

LOGI vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Logitech International SA and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

LOGI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Logitech International SA reported a gross profit of 607.94M and revenue of 1.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 49.47B and revenue of 60.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.4%.

LOGI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Logitech International SA reported an operating income of 258.55M and revenue of 1.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 18.78B and revenue of 60.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.9%.

LOGI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Logitech International SA reported a net income of 235.70M and revenue of 1.23B, resulting in a net margin of 19.2%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 15.85B and revenue of 60.80B, resulting in a net margin of 26.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LOGI and META have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

META has higher volatility (15.37%) compared to LOGI (11.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOGI dropped -80.58% vs META's -76.74%.

LOGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOGI and META

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer