LOCO vs. CMG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (LOCO) and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG).

Performance

LOCO vs. CMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (LOCO) and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LOCO vs. CMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LOCO El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.	32.70%	-9.36%	30.84%	-11.45%	-18.96%	-21.60%	19.55%	-0.20%	53.23%	-19.51%
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.	-11.81%	-38.64%	31.83%	64.83%	-20.64%	26.07%	65.65%	93.87%	49.39%	-23.40%

Fundamentals

Market Cap LOCO : $409.54M CMG : $43.07B
EPS LOCO : $0.90 CMG : $1.15
PE Ratio LOCO : 15.40 CMG : 28.40
PEG Ratio LOCO : 2.90 CMG : 1.06
PS Ratio LOCO : 0.83 CMG : 3.66
PB Ratio LOCO : 1.41 CMG : 15.22
Total Revenue (TTM) LOCO : $490.05M CMG : $11.93B
Gross Profit (TTM) LOCO : $84.32M CMG : $4.39B
EBITDA (TTM) LOCO : $58.01M CMG : $2.36B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOCO achieves a 32.70% return, which is significantly higher than CMG's -11.81% return. Over the past 10 years, LOCO has underperformed CMG with an annualized return of 1.56%, while CMG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.38% annualized return.

LOCO

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 25.05%
• YTD: 32.70%
• 6M: 47.03%
• 1Y: 33.21%
• 3Y*: 13.12%
• 5Y*: -0.41%
• 10Y*: 1.56%

CMG

• 1D: 1.94%
• 1M: -11.07%
• YTD: -11.81%
• 6M: -16.27%
• 1Y: -36.85%
• 3Y*: -1.52%
• 5Y*: 2.55%
• 10Y*: 13.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LOCO vs. CMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOCO

LOCO Risk / Return Rank: 69
LOCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
LOCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
LOCO Omega Ratio Rank: 64
LOCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
LOCO Martin Ratio Rank: 70

CMG

CMG Risk / Return Rank: 11
CMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
CMG Omega Ratio Rank: 8
CMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
CMG Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOCO vs. CMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (LOCO) and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LOCO	CMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	-0.93	+1.77
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	-1.21	+2.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	0.83	+0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	-0.72	+2.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.72	-1.18	+4.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LOCO vs. CMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOCO Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the CMG Sharpe Ratio of -0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOCO and CMG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LOCO	CMG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	-0.93	+1.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	0.08	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04	0.38	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	0.51	-0.59

Correlation

The correlation between LOCO and CMG is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LOCO vs. CMG - Dividend Comparison

Neither LOCO nor CMG has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
LOCO El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	15.06%
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

LOCO vs. CMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOCO drawdown since its inception was -83.59%, which is greater than CMG's maximum drawdown of -74.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOCO and CMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOCO	CMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.59%	-74.61%	-8.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.01%	-48.82%	+27.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.55%	-56.51%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.34%	-56.51%	-6.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.10%	-52.40%	-8.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.70%	-21.07%	-44.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.34%	29.59%	-20.25%

Volatility

LOCO vs. CMG - Volatility Comparison

El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (LOCO) has a higher volatility of 17.37% compared to Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) at 11.57%. This indicates that LOCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LOCO	CMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.37%	11.57%	+5.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.27%	31.27%	-3.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.60%	40.07%	-0.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.13%	33.25%	+1.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.04%	35.59%	+5.45%

Financials

LOCO vs. CMG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LOCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 123.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CMG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.06B and revenue of 2.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.1%.

LOCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 10.31M and revenue of 123.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.

CMG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported an operating income of 420.32M and revenue of 2.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.1%.

LOCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 6.54M and revenue of 123.52M, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.

CMG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported a net income of 330.93M and revenue of 2.98B, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.