LOCO vs. CMG

In the year-to-date period, LOCO achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly higher than CMG's -5.34% return. Over the past 10 years, LOCO has underperformed CMG with an annualized return of -5.58%, while CMG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.58% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (LOCO) and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LOCO Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the CMG Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOCO and CMG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither LOCO nor CMG has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum LOCO drawdown since its inception was -83.59%, which is greater than CMG's maximum drawdown of -74.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOCO and CMG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (LOCO) is 5.80%, while Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) has a volatility of 7.90%. This indicates that LOCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.