PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOB vs. PLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LOB vs. PLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. (LOB) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOB achieves a 24.80% return, which is significantly higher than PLD's 15.02% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LOB having a 13.02% annualized return and PLD not far ahead at 13.48%.


LOB

1D
0.80%
1M
4.26%
6M
7.28%
YTD
24.80%
1Y
38.48%
3Y*
4.94%
5Y*
-6.29%
10Y*
13.02%
ALL TIME*
8.35%

PLD

1D
-1.08%
1M
3.72%
6M
12.46%
YTD
15.02%
1Y
42.31%
3Y*
8.62%
5Y*
5.46%
10Y*
13.48%
ALL TIME*
11.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.30M$9.43M$10.13M
$720.86M$630.79M$561.34M

LOB vs. PLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LOB
Live Oak Bancshares, Inc.
24.80%-12.82%-12.82%51.27%-65.30%84.27%151.15%29.26%-37.60%29.47%
PLD
Prologis, Inc.
15.02%25.08%-18.12%21.58%-31.33%72.33%14.74%55.87%-6.25%25.94%

Correlation

The correlation between LOB and PLD is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2015

0.29

The correlation between LOB and PLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.43 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LOB:

$1.98B

PLD:

$134.83B

EPS

LOB:

$2.90

PLD:

$4.39

PE Ratio

LOB:

14.75

PLD:

32.90

PS Ratio

LOB:

1.84

PLD:

15.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

LOB:

$807.78M

PLD:

$9.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LOB:

$414.82M

PLD:

$2.67B

EBITDA (TTM)

LOB:

$174.02M

PLD:

$8.35B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Live Oak Bancshares, Inc.

Prologis, Inc.

Return for Risk

LOB vs. PLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LOB
LOB Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LOB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOB Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
LOB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOB Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

PLD
PLD Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LOB vs. PLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. (LOB) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LOBPLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.32

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

4.17

-2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.19

13.21

-10.02

LOB vs. PLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOB Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the PLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOB and PLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LOB vs. PLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOB drawdown since its inception was -79.41%, smaller than the maximum PLD drawdown of -84.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOB and PLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOBPLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.41%

-84.70%

+5.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.99%

-9.59%

-14.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.79%

-31.37%

-22.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.41%

-43.30%

-36.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.41%

-43.30%

-36.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.54%

-4.78%

-50.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.40%

-17.30%

-22.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.25%

3.02%

+8.23%

Volatility

LOB vs. PLD - Volatility Comparison

Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. (LOB) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to Prologis, Inc. (PLD) at 7.75%. This indicates that LOB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOBPLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.45%

7.75%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.05%

16.25%

+6.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.30%

22.30%

+12.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.41%

27.19%

+20.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.26%

27.08%

+20.18%

Dividends

LOB vs. PLD - Dividend Comparison

LOB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than PLD's 2.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LOB
Live Oak Bancshares, Inc.
0.28%0.35%0.30%0.26%0.40%0.14%0.25%0.63%0.81%0.42%0.38%0.14%
PLD
Prologis, Inc.
2.88%3.16%3.63%2.61%2.80%1.50%2.33%2.38%3.27%2.73%3.18%3.54%

Financials

LOB vs. PLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. and Prologis, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LOB and PLD have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LOB has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to PLD (7.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOB dropped -79.41% vs PLD's -84.70%.

PLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOB and PLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer