PortfoliosLab logo
LNW vs. KLAC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LNW and KLAC is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LNW vs. KLAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Light & Wonder Inc (LNW) and KLA Corporation (KLAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LNW:

-0.25

KLAC:

-0.01

Sortino Ratio

LNW:

-0.23

KLAC:

0.31

Omega Ratio

LNW:

0.96

KLAC:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

LNW:

-0.54

KLAC:

-0.03

Martin Ratio

LNW:

-1.11

KLAC:

-0.05

Ulcer Index

LNW:

15.08%

KLAC:

18.92%

Daily Std Dev

LNW:

44.40%

KLAC:

48.69%

Max Drawdown

LNW:

-96.51%

KLAC:

-83.74%

Current Drawdown

LNW:

-27.68%

KLAC:

-20.88%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LNW:

$6.88B

KLAC:

$92.73B

EPS

LNW:

$3.74

KLAC:

$27.49

PE Ratio

LNW:

21.79

KLAC:

25.51

PEG Ratio

LNW:

1.59

KLAC:

1.33

PS Ratio

LNW:

2.14

KLAC:

8.03

PB Ratio

LNW:

12.49

KLAC:

23.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

LNW:

$3.21B

KLAC:

$11.55B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LNW:

$2.28B

KLAC:

$7.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

LNW:

$821.00M

KLAC:

$4.88B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNW achieves a -5.66% return, which is significantly lower than KLAC's 11.53% return. Over the past 10 years, LNW has underperformed KLAC with an annualized return of 20.25%, while KLAC has yielded a comparatively higher 30.56% annualized return.


LNW

YTD

-5.66%

1M

4.46%

6M

-20.80%

1Y

-10.90%

5Y*

47.78%

10Y*

20.25%

KLAC

YTD

11.53%

1M

4.62%

6M

2.52%

1Y

-1.51%

5Y*

35.26%

10Y*

30.56%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LNW vs. KLAC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LNW is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LNW is 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LNW is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LNW is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LNW is 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LNW is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

KLAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KLAC is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KLAC is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KLAC is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KLAC is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KLAC is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KLAC is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LNW vs. KLAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Light & Wonder Inc (LNW) and KLA Corporation (KLAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LNW Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the KLAC Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNW and KLAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

LNW vs. KLAC - Dividend Comparison

LNW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KLAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LNW
Light & Wonder Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KLAC
KLA Corporation
0.90%0.96%0.92%1.25%0.91%1.35%1.74%3.17%2.15%2.67%2.94%26.17%

Drawdowns

LNW vs. KLAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNW drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, which is greater than KLAC's maximum drawdown of -83.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNW and KLAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

LNW vs. KLAC - Volatility Comparison

Light & Wonder Inc (LNW) has a higher volatility of 19.16% compared to KLA Corporation (KLAC) at 13.19%. This indicates that LNW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

LNW vs. KLAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Light & Wonder Inc and KLA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20212022202320242025
774.00M
3.06B
(LNW) Total Revenue
(KLAC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LNW vs. KLAC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Light & Wonder Inc and KLA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
72.7%
61.6%
(LNW) Gross Margin
(KLAC) Gross Margin
LNW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Light & Wonder Inc reported a gross profit of 563.00M and revenue of 774.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.7%.

KLAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, KLA Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.89B and revenue of 3.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.

LNW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Light & Wonder Inc reported an operating income of 190.00M and revenue of 774.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.6%.

KLAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, KLA Corporation reported an operating income of 1.30B and revenue of 3.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.5%.

LNW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Light & Wonder Inc reported a net income of 82.00M and revenue of 774.00M, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.

KLAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, KLA Corporation reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 3.06B, resulting in a net margin of 35.5%.