PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LNTH vs. CELH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LNTH vs. CELH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) and Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNTH achieves a 59.32% return, which is significantly higher than CELH's -38.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LNTH having a 44.03% annualized return and CELH not far behind at 42.84%.


LNTH

1D
-0.16%
1M
2.94%
YTD
59.32%
6M
59.37%
1Y
31.21%
3Y*
4.65%
5Y*
31.92%
10Y*
44.03%

CELH

1D
-3.30%
1M
-6.51%
YTD
-38.43%
6M
-36.88%
1Y
-34.25%
3Y*
-17.44%
5Y*
2.90%
10Y*
42.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LNTH vs. CELH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LNTH
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
59.32%-25.61%44.29%21.66%76.39%114.16%-34.23%31.05%-23.47%137.79%
CELH
Celsius Holdings, Inc.
-38.43%73.65%-51.69%57.21%39.52%48.22%941.61%39.19%-33.90%114.29%

Correlation

The correlation between LNTH and CELH is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.21

The correlation between LNTH and CELH shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LNTH:

$6.97B

CELH:

$7.31B

EPS

LNTH:

$4.13

CELH:

$0.61

PE Ratio

LNTH:

25.66

CELH:

46.00

PEG Ratio

LNTH:

0.10

CELH:

0.05

PS Ratio

LNTH:

4.63

CELH:

2.30

PB Ratio

LNTH:

5.75

CELH:

18.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

LNTH:

$1.55B

CELH:

$2.97B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LNTH:

$935.17M

CELH:

$1.47B

EBITDA (TTM)

LNTH:

$369.99M

CELH:

$274.27M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LNTH vs. CELH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNTH
LNTH Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
LNTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LNTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
LNTH Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
LNTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
LNTH Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

CELH
CELH Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
CELH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CELH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
CELH Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CELH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CELH Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNTH vs. CELH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) and Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LNTHCELHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.92

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

-0.60

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.37

-1.09

+2.47

LNTH vs. CELH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNTH Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the CELH Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNTH and CELH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LNTH vs. CELH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNTH drawdown since its inception was -78.62%, roughly equal to the maximum CELH drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNTH and CELH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LNTHCELHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.62%

-77.86%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.22%

-57.22%

+17.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.46%

-77.86%

+18.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.46%

-77.86%

+18.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.52%

-77.86%

+9.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.23%

-70.70%

+56.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.16%

-28.01%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.77%

31.32%

-8.55%

Volatility

LNTH vs. CELH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) is 11.91%, while Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) has a volatility of 16.73%. This indicates that LNTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CELH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LNTHCELHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.91%

16.73%

-4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.21%

37.49%

-13.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.25%

56.60%

-9.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.92%

65.38%

-8.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.43%

68.98%

-7.55%

Dividends

LNTH vs. CELH - Dividend Comparison

Neither LNTH nor CELH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LNTH vs. CELH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lantheus Holdings, Inc. and Celsius Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
377.33M
782.62M
(LNTH) Total Revenue
(CELH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LNTH vs. CELH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lantheus Holdings, Inc. and Celsius Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
61.2%
48.3%
Portfolio components
LNTH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lantheus Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 230.92M and revenue of 377.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.2%.

CELH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 378.07M and revenue of 782.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.3%.

LNTH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lantheus Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 81.33M and revenue of 377.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.

CELH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 138.99M and revenue of 782.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.8%.

LNTH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lantheus Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 118.42M and revenue of 377.33M, resulting in a net margin of 31.4%.

CELH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 85.08M and revenue of 782.62M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LNTH and CELH have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CELH has higher volatility (16.73%) compared to LNTH (11.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNTH dropped -78.62% vs CELH's -77.86%.

LNTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LNTH and CELH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer