PortfoliosLab logo
LNGG vs. MAGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LNGG and MAGS is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LNGG vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Alerian LNG ETF (LNGG) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


LNGG

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

MAGS

YTD

-3.80%

1M

10.33%

6M

1.96%

1Y

27.51%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Roundhill Alerian LNG ETF

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF

LNGG vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

LNGG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LNGG vs. MAGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNGG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LNGG is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LNGG is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LNGG is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LNGG is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LNGG is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LNGG is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

MAGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MAGS is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MAGS is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MAGS is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MAGS is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MAGS is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MAGS is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LNGG vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Alerian LNG ETF (LNGG) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

LNGG vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

LNGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%.


TTM20242023
LNGG
Roundhill Alerian LNG ETF
1.94%1.94%2.22%
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
0.84%0.81%0.44%

Drawdowns

LNGG vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

LNGG vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...