PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LNGG vs. MAGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


LNGGMAGS
YTD Return2.69%34.68%
Daily Std Dev14.49%25.23%
Max Drawdown-10.98%-18.10%
Current Drawdown-7.87%-9.61%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between LNGG and MAGS is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

LNGG vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LNGG achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly lower than MAGS's 34.68% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.60%
14.55%
LNGG
MAGS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LNGG vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

LNGG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.


LNGG
Roundhill Alerian LNG ETF
Expense ratio chart for LNGG: current value at 0.65% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.65%
Expense ratio chart for MAGS: current value at 0.29% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.29%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LNGG vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Alerian LNG ETF (LNGG) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LNGG
Sharpe ratio
No data
MAGS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MAGS, currently valued at 1.79, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.79
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MAGS, currently valued at 2.36, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.36
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MAGS, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MAGS, currently valued at 2.50, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.50
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MAGS, currently valued at 8.05, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.05

LNGG vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

LNGG vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

LNGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than MAGS's 0.32% yield.


TTM2023
LNGG
Roundhill Alerian LNG ETF
4.33%2.22%
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
0.32%0.44%

Drawdowns

LNGG vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNGG drawdown since its inception was -10.98%, smaller than the maximum MAGS drawdown of -18.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNGG and MAGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-7.87%
-9.61%
LNGG
MAGS

Volatility

LNGG vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Alerian LNG ETF (LNGG) is 4.50%, while Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a volatility of 7.93%. This indicates that LNGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
4.50%
7.93%
LNGG
MAGS