PortfoliosLab logo
LNG vs. CTRA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LNG and CTRA is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.3

Performance

LNG vs. CTRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

2,200.00%2,400.00%2,600.00%2,800.00%3,000.00%3,200.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2,876.32%
2,727.37%
LNG
CTRA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LNG:

1.66

CTRA:

-0.24

Sortino Ratio

LNG:

2.12

CTRA:

-0.15

Omega Ratio

LNG:

1.31

CTRA:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

LNG:

2.19

CTRA:

-0.23

Martin Ratio

LNG:

7.02

CTRA:

-0.64

Ulcer Index

LNG:

6.87%

CTRA:

10.71%

Daily Std Dev

LNG:

29.11%

CTRA:

28.14%

Max Drawdown

LNG:

-97.84%

CTRA:

-74.41%

Current Drawdown

LNG:

-7.86%

CTRA:

-19.74%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LNG:

$51.75B

CTRA:

$19.45B

EPS

LNG:

$14.21

CTRA:

$1.50

PE Ratio

LNG:

16.35

CTRA:

16.97

PEG Ratio

LNG:

2.03

CTRA:

44.67

PS Ratio

LNG:

3.35

CTRA:

3.71

PB Ratio

LNG:

8.92

CTRA:

1.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

LNG:

$11.45B

CTRA:

$3.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LNG:

$7.35B

CTRA:

$1.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

LNG:

$3.65B

CTRA:

$2.42B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 8.77% return, which is significantly higher than CTRA's 0.14% return. Over the past 10 years, LNG has outperformed CTRA with an annualized return of 12.39%, while CTRA has yielded a comparatively lower 0.15% annualized return.


LNG

YTD

8.77%

1M

0.31%

6M

26.69%

1Y

47.79%

5Y*

42.11%

10Y*

12.39%

CTRA

YTD

0.14%

1M

-12.12%

6M

8.13%

1Y

-7.80%

5Y*

9.78%

10Y*

0.15%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LNG vs. CTRA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LNG is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LNG is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LNG is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LNG is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LNG is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LNG is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

CTRA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CTRA is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CTRA is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CTRA is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CTRA is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CTRA is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CTRA is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LNG vs. CTRA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for LNG, currently valued at 1.66, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
LNG: 1.66
CTRA: -0.24
The chart of Sortino ratio for LNG, currently valued at 2.12, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
LNG: 2.12
CTRA: -0.15
The chart of Omega ratio for LNG, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
LNG: 1.31
CTRA: 0.98
The chart of Calmar ratio for LNG, currently valued at 2.19, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
LNG: 2.19
CTRA: -0.23
The chart of Martin ratio for LNG, currently valued at 7.02, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
LNG: 7.02
CTRA: -0.64

The current LNG Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the CTRA Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNG and CTRA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.66
-0.24
LNG
CTRA

Dividends

LNG vs. CTRA - Dividend Comparison

LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than CTRA's 3.35% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.80%0.84%0.95%0.92%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CTRA
Coterra Energy Inc.
3.35%3.29%4.58%10.13%5.89%2.46%2.01%1.12%0.59%0.34%0.45%0.27%

Drawdowns

LNG vs. CTRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than CTRA's maximum drawdown of -74.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and CTRA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-7.86%
-19.74%
LNG
CTRA

Volatility

LNG vs. CTRA - Volatility Comparison

Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) has a higher volatility of 16.84% compared to Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) at 13.63%. This indicates that LNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
16.84%
13.63%
LNG
CTRA

Financials

LNG vs. CTRA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Coterra Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items