LNG vs. CTRA
Compare and contrast key facts about Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LNG or CTRA.
Correlation
The correlation between LNG and CTRA is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LNG vs. CTRA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LNG:
1.02
CTRA:
-0.20
LNG:
1.60
CTRA:
-0.13
LNG:
1.19
CTRA:
0.98
LNG:
1.26
CTRA:
-0.16
LNG:
3.57
CTRA:
-0.50
LNG:
5.61%
CTRA:
9.49%
LNG:
19.72%
CTRA:
23.23%
LNG:
-97.84%
CTRA:
-74.41%
LNG:
-8.84%
CTRA:
-25.72%
Fundamentals
LNG:
$47.27B
CTRA:
$18.06B
LNG:
$15.73
CTRA:
$1.65
LNG:
13.39
CTRA:
14.86
LNG:
0.60
CTRA:
44.67
LNG:
$16.09B
CTRA:
$5.45B
LNG:
$9.35B
CTRA:
$1.80B
LNG:
$8.11B
CTRA:
$3.52B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 21.89% return, which is significantly higher than CTRA's -4.19% return. Over the past 10 years, LNG has outperformed CTRA with an annualized return of 11.76%, while CTRA has yielded a comparatively lower 0.33% annualized return.
LNG
21.89%
-6.41%
26.24%
21.63%
28.40%
11.76%
CTRA
-4.19%
-9.97%
-10.46%
-3.09%
11.76%
0.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LNG vs. CTRA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LNG vs. CTRA - Dividend Comparison
LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than CTRA's 3.55% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.88% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CTRA Coterra Energy Inc. | 3.55% | 4.58% | 10.13% | 5.89% | 2.46% | 2.01% | 1.12% | 0.59% | 0.34% | 0.45% | 0.27% | 0.15% |
Drawdowns
LNG vs. CTRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than CTRA's maximum drawdown of -74.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and CTRA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LNG vs. CTRA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) is 6.08%, while Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) has a volatility of 7.54%. This indicates that LNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LNG vs. CTRA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Coterra Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities