LNG vs. CTRA

In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 26.13% return, which is significantly higher than CTRA's 3.54% return. Over the past 10 years, LNG has outperformed CTRA with an annualized return of 11.44%, while CTRA has yielded a comparatively lower -0.18% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LNG Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the CTRA Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNG and CTRA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than CTRA's 3.28% yield.

The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than CTRA's maximum drawdown of -74.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and CTRA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) is 8.45%, while Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) has a volatility of 8.92%. This indicates that LNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Coterra Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.