PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LNG vs. AVEMX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LNG and AVEMX is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

LNG vs. AVEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Ave Maria Value Fund (AVEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
36.72%
2.54%
LNG
AVEMX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LNG:

2.37

AVEMX:

1.08

Sortino Ratio

LNG:

3.40

AVEMX:

1.46

Omega Ratio

LNG:

1.41

AVEMX:

1.23

Calmar Ratio

LNG:

3.10

AVEMX:

0.99

Martin Ratio

LNG:

11.77

AVEMX:

4.06

Ulcer Index

LNG:

4.18%

AVEMX:

4.97%

Daily Std Dev

LNG:

20.76%

AVEMX:

18.76%

Max Drawdown

LNG:

-97.84%

AVEMX:

-60.09%

Current Drawdown

LNG:

0.00%

AVEMX:

-16.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 13.13% return, which is significantly higher than AVEMX's 4.43% return. Over the past 10 years, LNG has outperformed AVEMX with an annualized return of 13.17%, while AVEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.03% annualized return.


LNG

YTD

13.13%

1M

14.09%

6M

36.72%

1Y

48.81%

5Y*

30.88%

10Y*

13.17%

AVEMX

YTD

4.43%

1M

-8.13%

6M

2.54%

1Y

19.46%

5Y*

7.41%

10Y*

4.03%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LNG vs. AVEMX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LNG is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LNG is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LNG is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LNG is 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LNG is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LNG is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

AVEMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AVEMX is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AVEMX is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AVEMX is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AVEMX is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AVEMX is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AVEMX is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LNG vs. AVEMX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Ave Maria Value Fund (AVEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LNG, currently valued at 2.37, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.002.371.08
The chart of Sortino ratio for LNG, currently valued at 3.40, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.401.46
The chart of Omega ratio for LNG, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.411.23
The chart of Calmar ratio for LNG, currently valued at 3.10, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.100.99
The chart of Martin ratio for LNG, currently valued at 11.77, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0011.774.06
LNG
AVEMX

The current LNG Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the AVEMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNG and AVEMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.37
1.08
LNG
AVEMX

Dividends

LNG vs. AVEMX - Dividend Comparison

LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while AVEMX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.74%0.84%0.95%0.92%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AVEMX
Ave Maria Value Fund
0.00%0.00%0.82%1.15%0.27%0.47%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.07%

Drawdowns

LNG vs. AVEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than AVEMX's maximum drawdown of -60.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and AVEMX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember20250
-16.79%
LNG
AVEMX

Volatility

LNG vs. AVEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) is 7.16%, while Ave Maria Value Fund (AVEMX) has a volatility of 10.79%. This indicates that LNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
7.16%
10.79%
LNG
AVEMX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab