PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LND vs. LAND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LND vs. LAND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) and Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LND achieves a 4.47% return, which is significantly higher than LAND's 2.77% return. Over the past 10 years, LND has outperformed LAND with an annualized return of 8.21%, while LAND has yielded a comparatively lower 2.82% annualized return.


LND

1D
-2.60%
1M
-2.35%
YTD
4.47%
6M
0.00%
1Y
0.94%
3Y*
0.32%
5Y*
-2.63%
10Y*
8.21%

LAND

1D
-1.39%
1M
-3.69%
YTD
2.77%
6M
2.53%
1Y
-1.15%
3Y*
-13.65%
5Y*
-14.18%
10Y*
2.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LND vs. LAND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LND
BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas
4.47%3.05%-27.24%4.20%23.23%17.11%8.24%25.19%20.93%9.47%
LAND
Gladstone Land Corporation
2.77%-10.69%-21.63%-18.49%-44.42%136.25%17.35%18.07%-10.82%24.66%

Correlation

The correlation between LND and LAND is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2013

0.13

The correlation between LND and LAND shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.25 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LND:

$372.56M

LAND:

$375.47M

EPS

LND:

-$0.32

LAND:

-$0.31

PS Ratio

LND:

0.88

LAND:

3.98

PB Ratio

LND:

0.18

LAND:

0.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

LND:

$426.76M

LAND:

$86.33M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LND:

$106.95M

LAND:

$12.83M

EBITDA (TTM)

LND:

$77.30M

LAND:

$64.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LND vs. LAND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LND
LND Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
LND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
LND Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
LND Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
LND Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

LAND
LAND Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
LAND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAND Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
LAND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAND Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LND vs. LAND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) and Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LNDLANDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.04

-0.04

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.24

0.16

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.02

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.06

-0.05

+0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.14

-0.08

+0.23

LND vs. LAND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LND Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is higher than the LAND Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LND and LAND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LNDLANDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

-0.04

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

-0.45

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

0.09

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.03

+0.11

Drawdowns

LND vs. LAND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LND drawdown since its inception was -53.59%, smaller than the maximum LAND drawdown of -76.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LND and LAND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LNDLANDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.59%

-76.45%

+22.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.87%

-25.44%

+10.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.28%

-45.24%

+12.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.76%

-76.45%

+29.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.59%

-76.45%

+27.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.64%

-73.73%

+39.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.73%

-30.62%

+8.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.66%

13.77%

-7.11%

Volatility

LND vs. LAND - Volatility Comparison

BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) at 6.99%. This indicates that LND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LNDLANDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.44%

6.99%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.74%

21.98%

-2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.21%

29.59%

-3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.89%

31.43%

+5.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.78%

29.96%

+10.82%

Dividends

LND vs. LAND - Dividend Comparison

LND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than LAND's 6.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LAND
Gladstone Land Corporation
6.10%6.12%5.16%3.83%2.98%1.60%3.67%4.12%4.63%3.90%4.40%5.38%
LND
BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas
3.78%3.95%7.44%12.40%18.07%8.86%2.54%4.67%4.75%1.93%4.78%11.78%

Financials

LND vs. LAND - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas and Gladstone Land Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M20222023202420252026
26.87M
14.80M
(LND) Total Revenue
(LAND) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LND vs. LAND - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas and Gladstone Land Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
8.4%
98.9%
Portfolio components
LND - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas reported a gross profit of 2.25M and revenue of 26.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.4%.

LAND - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported a gross profit of 14.64M and revenue of 14.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.9%.

LND - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas reported an operating income of -7.05M and revenue of 26.87M, resulting in an operating margin of -26.2%.

LAND - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported an operating income of 12.68M and revenue of 14.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 85.7%.

LND - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas reported a net income of -2.72M and revenue of 26.87M, resulting in a net margin of -10.1%.

LAND - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported a net income of -9.99M and revenue of 14.80M, resulting in a net margin of -67.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LND and LAND have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LND has higher volatility (7.44%) compared to LAND (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LND dropped -53.59% vs LAND's -76.45%.

LND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LND and LAND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer