LMB vs. FNGU
Compare and contrast key facts about Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU).
FNGU is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG (TR) (300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LMB or FNGU.
Correlation
The correlation between LMB and FNGU is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LMB vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LMB:
1.52
FNGU:
1.42
LMB:
2.11
FNGU:
1.92
LMB:
1.27
FNGU:
1.25
LMB:
3.67
FNGU:
2.23
LMB:
9.17
FNGU:
5.90
LMB:
9.90%
FNGU:
17.81%
LMB:
59.82%
FNGU:
73.99%
LMB:
-84.10%
FNGU:
-92.34%
LMB:
-18.09%
FNGU:
-3.52%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMB achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's 14.90% return.
LMB
0.87%
-7.41%
38.74%
103.35%
80.95%
27.75%
FNGU
14.90%
12.32%
54.64%
123.82%
45.51%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LMB vs. FNGU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
LMB
FNGU
LMB vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LMB vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison
Neither LMB nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
LMB vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMB drawdown since its inception was -84.10%, smaller than the maximum FNGU drawdown of -92.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMB and FNGU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LMB vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison
Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) has a higher volatility of 23.10% compared to MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) at 20.63%. This indicates that LMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.