LMB vs. CBOE

In the year-to-date period, LMB achieves a 95.07% return, which is significantly higher than CBOE's 9.84% return. Over the past 10 years, LMB has outperformed CBOE with an annualized return of 28.32%, while CBOE has yielded a comparatively lower 13.17% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) and Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the CBOE Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMB and CBOE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LMB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%.

The maximum LMB drawdown since its inception was -84.10%, which is greater than CBOE's maximum drawdown of -43.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMB and CBOE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) has a higher volatility of 12.33% compared to Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) at 6.63%. This indicates that LMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Limbach Holdings, Inc. and Cboe Global Markets, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.