PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMAT vs. TGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LMAT vs. TGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) and Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (TGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMAT achieves a 13.51% return, which is significantly higher than TGS's 1.06% return. Over the past 10 years, LMAT has outperformed TGS with an annualized return of 21.12%, while TGS has yielded a comparatively lower 19.54% annualized return.


LMAT

1D
0.22%
1M
-18.02%
YTD
13.51%
6M
10.01%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
13.28%
5Y*
13.37%
10Y*
21.12%

TGS

1D
-0.57%
1M
7.35%
YTD
1.06%
6M
1.85%
1Y
12.25%
3Y*
35.04%
5Y*
42.70%
10Y*
19.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMAT vs. TGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMAT
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.
13.51%-10.95%63.63%24.60%-7.40%25.10%14.09%53.77%-25.13%26.58%
TGS
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A.
1.06%6.22%93.97%27.88%165.77%-14.62%-27.48%-45.44%-28.91%146.45%

Correlation

The correlation between LMAT and TGS is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2006

0.10

The correlation between LMAT and TGS shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.13 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LMAT:

$2.11B

TGS:

$4.73B

EPS

LMAT:

$2.68

TGS:

$3.05K

PE Ratio

LMAT:

34.24

TGS:

0.01

PEG Ratio

LMAT:

1.47

TGS:

0.00

PS Ratio

LMAT:

8.34

TGS:

0.00

PB Ratio

LMAT:

5.19

TGS:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

LMAT:

$256.28M

TGS:

$1.82T

Gross Profit (TTM)

LMAT:

$185.52M

TGS:

$985.40B

EBITDA (TTM)

LMAT:

$90.48M

TGS:

$1.03T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMAT vs. TGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMAT
LMAT Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
LMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

TGS
TGS Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
TGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
TGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGS Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMAT vs. TGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) and Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (TGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMATTGSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.41

0.20

+0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.04

0.81

+0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.10

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

0.37

+0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.18

0.94

+0.24

LMAT vs. TGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is higher than the TGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMAT and TGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMATTGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

0.20

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.77

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.36

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.22

+0.11

Drawdowns

LMAT vs. TGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMAT drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, smaller than the maximum TGS drawdown of -95.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMAT and TGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMATTGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.69%

-95.49%

+19.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.93%

-32.96%

+11.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.32%

-39.49%

+6.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.93%

-39.49%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.65%

-80.55%

+32.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.76%

-11.04%

-10.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.95%

-47.08%

+28.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.56%

12.95%

-2.39%

Volatility

LMAT vs. TGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) is 10.00%, while Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (TGS) has a volatility of 13.76%. This indicates that LMAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMATTGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.00%

13.76%

-3.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.18%

25.97%

+3.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.61%

60.51%

-23.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.40%

55.51%

-19.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.47%

54.35%

-12.88%

Dividends

LMAT vs. TGS - Dividend Comparison

LMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while TGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMAT
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.
0.98%1.23%0.69%0.99%1.09%0.88%0.94%0.95%1.18%0.69%0.71%0.93%
TGS
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.46%5.04%0.00%0.34%0.00%

Financials

LMAT vs. TGS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. and Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00B200.00B300.00B400.00B500.00B600.00B20222023202420252026
66.55M
484.20B
(LMAT) Total Revenue
(TGS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LMAT vs. TGS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. and Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
72.7%
58.3%
Portfolio components
LMAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. reported a gross profit of 48.40M and revenue of 66.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.7%.

TGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. reported a gross profit of 282.03B and revenue of 484.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.3%.

LMAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. reported an operating income of 17.78M and revenue of 66.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.7%.

TGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. reported an operating income of 249.34B and revenue of 484.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.5%.

LMAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. reported a net income of 15.68M and revenue of 66.55M, resulting in a net margin of 23.6%.

TGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. reported a net income of 159.98B and revenue of 484.20B, resulting in a net margin of 33.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LMAT and TGS have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TGS has higher volatility (13.76%) compared to LMAT (10.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMAT dropped -75.69% vs TGS's -95.49%.

LMAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.41 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMAT and TGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer