PortfoliosLab logo
LIT vs. MTDR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LIT and MTDR is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.6

Performance

LIT vs. MTDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) and Matador Resources Company (MTDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
28.98%
264.39%
LIT
MTDR

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LIT:

-0.35

MTDR:

-0.79

Sortino Ratio

LIT:

-0.32

MTDR:

-0.96

Omega Ratio

LIT:

0.96

MTDR:

0.87

Calmar Ratio

LIT:

-0.18

MTDR:

-0.74

Martin Ratio

LIT:

-0.77

MTDR:

-2.01

Ulcer Index

LIT:

15.32%

MTDR:

17.85%

Daily Std Dev

LIT:

33.42%

MTDR:

45.33%

Max Drawdown

LIT:

-65.91%

MTDR:

-96.50%

Current Drawdown

LIT:

-60.39%

MTDR:

-42.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIT achieves a -9.32% return, which is significantly higher than MTDR's -26.56% return. Over the past 10 years, LIT has outperformed MTDR with an annualized return of 5.39%, while MTDR has yielded a comparatively lower 4.58% annualized return.


LIT

YTD

-9.32%

1M

-8.26%

6M

-15.13%

1Y

-11.55%

5Y*

9.81%

10Y*

5.39%

MTDR

YTD

-26.56%

1M

-21.38%

6M

-19.95%

1Y

-36.30%

5Y*

57.73%

10Y*

4.58%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LIT vs. MTDR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LIT is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LIT is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LIT is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LIT is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LIT is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LIT is 88
Martin Ratio Rank

MTDR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MTDR is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MTDR is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MTDR is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MTDR is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MTDR is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MTDR is 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LIT vs. MTDR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) and Matador Resources Company (MTDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for LIT, currently valued at -0.35, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
LIT: -0.35
MTDR: -0.79
The chart of Sortino ratio for LIT, currently valued at -0.32, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
LIT: -0.32
MTDR: -0.96
The chart of Omega ratio for LIT, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
LIT: 0.96
MTDR: 0.87
The chart of Calmar ratio for LIT, currently valued at -0.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
LIT: -0.18
MTDR: -0.74
The chart of Martin ratio for LIT, currently valued at -0.77, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
LIT: -0.77
MTDR: -2.01

The current LIT Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is higher than the MTDR Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIT and MTDR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.35
-0.79
LIT
MTDR

Dividends

LIT vs. MTDR - Dividend Comparison

LIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than MTDR's 2.34% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
1.03%0.93%1.11%0.99%0.22%0.40%1.85%2.52%3.26%2.15%0.24%1.07%
MTDR
Matador Resources Company
2.34%1.51%1.14%0.52%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LIT vs. MTDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIT drawdown since its inception was -65.91%, smaller than the maximum MTDR drawdown of -96.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIT and MTDR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-60.39%
-42.09%
LIT
MTDR

Volatility

LIT vs. MTDR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) is 15.40%, while Matador Resources Company (MTDR) has a volatility of 30.53%. This indicates that LIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
15.40%
30.53%
LIT
MTDR