PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIND vs. FMAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LIND vs. FMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. (LIND) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIND achieves a 57.42% return, which is significantly higher than FMAT's 13.39% return. Over the past 10 years, LIND has underperformed FMAT with an annualized return of 8.76%, while FMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 10.36% annualized return.


LIND

1D
-1.13%
1M
22.37%
YTD
57.42%
6M
92.37%
1Y
115.57%
3Y*
30.14%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
8.76%

FMAT

1D
1.33%
1M
1.16%
YTD
13.39%
6M
17.38%
1Y
24.26%
3Y*
12.50%
5Y*
5.92%
10Y*
10.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIND vs. FMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LIND
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.
57.42%21.59%5.24%46.36%-50.64%-8.88%4.71%21.47%37.49%3.60%
FMAT
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
13.39%12.11%0.47%13.71%-11.54%27.45%19.57%23.35%-17.40%23.51%

Correlation

The correlation between LIND and FMAT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2015

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIND vs. FMAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIND
LIND Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
LIND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIND Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIND Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
LIND Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIND Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FMAT
FMAT Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIND vs. FMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. (LIND) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LINDFMATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.39

1.38

+1.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.19

1.97

+1.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.24

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.91

1.84

+3.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.11

6.07

+4.03

LIND vs. FMAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIND Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the FMAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIND and FMAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LINDFMATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

1.38

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.30

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

0.49

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.45

-0.33

Drawdowns

LIND vs. FMAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIND drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, which is greater than FMAT's maximum drawdown of -41.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIND and FMAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LINDFMATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.16%

-41.11%

-42.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.67%

-13.48%

-10.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.93%

-23.17%

-27.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.75%

-25.40%

-43.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.16%

-41.11%

-42.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-3.68%

+2.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.04%

-6.87%

-23.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.50%

4.09%

+7.41%

Volatility

LIND vs. FMAT - Volatility Comparison

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. (LIND) has a higher volatility of 21.10% compared to Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) at 6.35%. This indicates that LIND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LINDFMATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.10%

6.35%

+14.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.85%

13.95%

+23.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.58%

17.66%

+30.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.51%

19.60%

+46.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.17%

21.20%

+40.97%

Dividends

LIND vs. FMAT - Dividend Comparison

LIND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMAT
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
1.41%1.64%1.68%1.71%2.00%1.44%1.73%1.89%2.18%1.53%1.78%2.16%
LIND
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LIND and FMAT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LIND has higher volatility (21.10%) compared to FMAT (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIND dropped -83.16% vs FMAT's -41.11%.

LIND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIND and FMAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer