PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LIND vs. FMAT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LIND vs. FMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. (LIND) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
57.86%
5.63%
LIND
FMAT

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIND achieves a 14.02% return, which is significantly higher than FMAT's 12.12% return.


LIND

YTD

14.02%

1M

34.13%

6M

57.86%

1Y

71.79%

5Y (annualized)

-3.12%

10Y (annualized)

N/A

FMAT

YTD

12.12%

1M

0.02%

6M

5.63%

1Y

21.02%

5Y (annualized)

12.37%

10Y (annualized)

8.69%

Key characteristics


LINDFMAT
Sharpe Ratio1.181.47
Sortino Ratio2.122.06
Omega Ratio1.241.25
Calmar Ratio1.062.59
Martin Ratio3.236.84
Ulcer Index22.26%3.07%
Daily Std Dev60.93%14.27%
Max Drawdown-83.16%-41.11%
Current Drawdown-40.29%-2.10%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between LIND and FMAT is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LIND vs. FMAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. (LIND) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LIND, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.181.47
The chart of Sortino ratio for LIND, currently valued at 2.12, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.122.06
The chart of Omega ratio for LIND, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.241.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for LIND, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.062.59
The chart of Martin ratio for LIND, currently valued at 3.23, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.236.84
LIND
FMAT

The current LIND Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the FMAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIND and FMAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.18
1.47
LIND
FMAT

Dividends

LIND vs. FMAT - Dividend Comparison

LIND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LIND
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FMAT
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
1.51%1.71%2.00%1.44%1.73%1.89%2.18%1.53%1.78%2.16%1.65%0.39%

Drawdowns

LIND vs. FMAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIND drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, which is greater than FMAT's maximum drawdown of -41.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIND and FMAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-40.29%
-2.10%
LIND
FMAT

Volatility

LIND vs. FMAT - Volatility Comparison

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. (LIND) has a higher volatility of 27.37% compared to Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) at 4.18%. This indicates that LIND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
27.37%
4.18%
LIND
FMAT