LIND vs. CCL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LIND (Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.) and CCL (Carnival Corporation & Plc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Travel Services industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, LIND returned 8.29%/yr vs -4.22%/yr for CCL. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

LIND vs. CCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. (LIND) and Carnival Corporation & Plc (CCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIND achieves a 50.76% return, which is significantly higher than CCL's -10.08% return. Over the past 10 years, LIND has outperformed CCL with an annualized return of 8.29%, while CCL has yielded a comparatively lower -4.22% annualized return.

LIND

• 1D: -4.23%
• 1M: 21.86%
• YTD: 50.76%
• 6M: 80.71%
• 1Y: 98.90%
• 3Y*: 28.27%
• 5Y*: 4.76%
• 10Y*: 8.29%

CCL

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: 6.49%
• YTD: -10.08%
• 6M: 5.46%
• 1Y: 14.76%
• 3Y*: 31.13%
• 5Y*: -2.10%
• 10Y*: -4.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIND vs. CCL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LIND Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.	50.76%	21.59%	5.24%	46.36%	-50.64%	-8.88%	4.71%	21.47%	37.49%	3.60%
CCL Carnival Corporation & Plc	-10.08%	22.55%	34.41%	130.02%	-59.94%	-7.11%	-56.89%	7.37%	-23.40%	30.76%

Correlation

The correlation between LIND and CCL is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2015	0.52

The correlation between LIND and CCL shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap LIND : $1.33B CCL : $37.82B
EPS LIND : -$0.43 CCL : $2.21
PS Ratio LIND : 2.08 CCL : 1.41
Total Revenue (TTM) LIND : $591.30M CCL : $26.98B
Gross Profit (TTM) LIND : $203.31M CCL : $10.13B
EBITDA (TTM) LIND : $71.33M CCL : $7.23B

Return for Risk

LIND vs. CCL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIND

LIND Risk / Return Rank: 86
LIND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
LIND Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
LIND Omega Ratio Rank: 83
LIND Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
LIND Martin Ratio Rank: 84

CCL

CCL Risk / Return Rank: 50
CCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
CCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
CCL Omega Ratio Rank: 47
CCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CCL Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIND vs. CCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. (LIND) and Carnival Corporation & Plc (CCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LIND	CCL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	0.32	+1.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	0.83	+2.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.10	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.20	0.51	+3.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.63	1.04	+7.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LIND vs. CCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIND Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the CCL Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIND and CCL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LIND	CCL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04	0.32	+1.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	-0.04	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.13	-0.07	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.17	-0.06

Drawdowns

LIND vs. CCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIND drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, smaller than the maximum CCL drawdown of -90.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIND and CCL.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIND	CCL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.16%	-90.37%	+7.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.67%	-29.30%	+5.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.93%	-42.85%	-8.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-68.75%	-79.47%	+10.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.16%	-90.37%	+7.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.40%	-58.53%	+53.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.03%	-28.56%	-1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.50%	14.24%	-2.74%

Volatility

LIND vs. CCL - Volatility Comparison

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. (LIND) has a higher volatility of 21.20% compared to Carnival Corporation & Plc (CCL) at 14.73%. This indicates that LIND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIND	CCL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.20%	14.73%	+6.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.15%	37.52%	+0.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.80%	46.45%	+2.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.52%	55.38%	+11.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.17%	57.55%	+4.62%

Dividends

LIND vs. CCL - Dividend Comparison

LIND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCL Carnival Corporation & Plc	1.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.31%	3.93%	3.96%	2.41%	2.59%	2.02%
LIND Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIND and CCL in my portfolio?

LIND and CCL have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIND or CCL?

LIND has higher volatility (21.20%) compared to CCL (14.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIND dropped -83.16% vs CCL's -90.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.