LINC vs. MCK

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

LINC (Lincoln Educational Services Corporation) and MCK (McKesson Corporation) are both stocks. LINC operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive), while MCK operates in Medical Distribution (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, LINC returned 41.00%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for MCK. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LINC vs. MCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and McKesson Corporation (MCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINC achieves a 103.15% return, which is significantly higher than MCK's -10.01% return. Over the past 10 years, LINC has outperformed MCK with an annualized return of 41.00%, while MCK has yielded a comparatively lower 15.61% annualized return.

LINC

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 19.86%
• YTD: 103.15%
• 6M: 125.98%
• 1Y: 112.56%
• 3Y*: 91.92%
• 5Y*: 45.40%
• 10Y*: 41.00%

MCK

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -9.39%
• YTD: -10.01%
• 6M: -11.03%
• 1Y: 2.50%
• 3Y*: 24.17%
• 5Y*: 31.32%
• 10Y*: 15.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LINC vs. MCK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation	103.15%	52.65%	57.57%	73.40%	-22.49%	14.92%	140.74%	-15.62%	58.42%	5.21%
MCK McKesson Corporation	-10.01%	44.54%	23.67%	24.13%	51.82%	44.23%	27.06%	26.72%	-28.40%	11.95%

Correlation

The correlation between LINC and MCK is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2005	0.14

The correlation between LINC and MCK shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (3 years) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap LINC : $1.54B MCK : $90.40B
EPS LINC : $0.72 MCK : $38.38
PE Ratio LINC : 68.51 MCK : 19.20
PEG Ratio LINC : 2.41 MCK : 0.26
PS Ratio LINC : 2.82 MCK : 0.23
PB Ratio LINC : 7.73 MCK : 13.07
Total Revenue (TTM) LINC : $544.69M MCK : $403.43B
Gross Profit (TTM) LINC : $242.75M MCK : $14.55B
EBITDA (TTM) LINC : $49.04M MCK : $6.91B

Return for Risk

LINC vs. MCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LINC

LINC Risk / Return Rank: 88
LINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
LINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
LINC Omega Ratio Rank: 87
LINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
LINC Martin Ratio Rank: 88

MCK

MCK Risk / Return Rank: 41
MCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
MCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
MCK Omega Ratio Rank: 37
MCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
MCK Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LINC vs. MCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and McKesson Corporation (MCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LINC	MCK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	0.09	+2.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.00	0.36	+2.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.05	+0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.88	0.11	+3.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.69	0.30	+10.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LINC vs. MCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LINC Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the MCK Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LINC and MCK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LINC	MCK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43	0.09	+2.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	1.30	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.54	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.44	-0.35

Drawdowns

LINC vs. MCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINC drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than MCK's maximum drawdown of -82.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINC and MCK.

Drawdown Indicators

	LINC	MCK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.11%	-82.84%	-16.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.35%	-27.17%	-0.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.35%	-27.17%	-0.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.96%	-27.17%	-14.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.51%	-44.23%	-13.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.69%	-25.92%	+20.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.13%	-28.65%	-30.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.93%	9.61%	+0.32%

Volatility

LINC vs. MCK - Volatility Comparison

Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) has a higher volatility of 17.64% compared to McKesson Corporation (MCK) at 9.57%. This indicates that LINC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LINC	MCK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.64%	9.57%	+8.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.24%	23.04%	+8.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.70%	28.92%	+17.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.95%	24.17%	+19.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.07%	28.81%	+28.26%

Dividends

LINC vs. MCK - Dividend Comparison

LINC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MCK McKesson Corporation	0.45%	0.37%	0.47%	0.50%	0.54%	0.72%	0.95%	1.16%	1.32%	0.80%	0.80%	0.53%

Financials

LINC vs. MCK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and McKesson Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LINC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 143.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MCK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McKesson Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.04B and revenue of 96.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.2%.

LINC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported an operating income of 6.41M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

MCK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McKesson Corporation reported an operating income of 2.09B and revenue of 96.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.

LINC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a net income of 4.36M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.

MCK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McKesson Corporation reported a net income of 1.68B and revenue of 96.30B, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LINC and MCK in my portfolio?

LINC and MCK have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LINC or MCK?

LINC has higher volatility (17.64%) compared to MCK (9.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LINC dropped -99.11% vs MCK's -82.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.