LINC vs. JBL
LINC (Lincoln Educational Services Corporation) and JBL (Jabil Inc.) are both stocks. LINC operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive), while JBL operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, LINC returned 42.05%/yr vs 32.59%/yr for JBL. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LINC vs. JBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LINC achieves a 123.06% return, which is significantly higher than JBL's 41.27% return. Over the past 10 years, LINC has outperformed JBL with an annualized return of 42.05%, while JBL has yielded a comparatively lower 32.59% annualized return.
LINC
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 16.73%
- 6M
- 115.83%
- YTD
- 123.06%
- 1Y
- 137.84%
- 3Y*
- 107.15%
- 5Y*
- 49.97%
- 10Y*
- 42.05%
JBL
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -16.33%
- 6M
- 39.71%
- YTD
- 41.27%
- 1Y
- 45.20%
- 3Y*
- 42.65%
- 5Y*
- 41.81%
- 10Y*
- 32.59%
LINC vs. JBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation | 123.06% | 52.65% | 57.57% | 73.40% | -22.49% | 14.92% | 140.74% | -15.62% | 58.42% | 5.21% |
JBL Jabil Inc. | 41.27% | 58.73% | 13.25% | 87.43% | -2.55% | 66.40% | 3.89% | 68.49% | -4.41% | 12.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between LINC and JBL is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005 | 0.23 |
The correlation between LINC and JBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LINC:
$1.71B
JBL:
$33.74B
LINC:
$0.72
JBL:
$7.99
LINC:
75.25
JBL:
40.30
LINC:
2.64
JBL:
2.15
LINC:
3.10
JBL:
1.03
LINC:
8.49
JBL:
25.92
LINC:
$544.69M
JBL:
$33.59B
LINC:
$242.75M
JBL:
$3.10B
LINC:
$49.04M
JBL:
$1.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LINC vs. JBL — Risk / Return Rank
LINC
JBL
LINC vs. JBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and Jabil Inc. (JBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LINC | JBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.20 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.07 | 2.54 | +2.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.75 | 6.18 | +7.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LINC vs. JBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LINC drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, roughly equal to the maximum JBL drawdown of -94.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINC and JBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LINC | JBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.11% | -94.92% | -4.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.35% | -17.86% | -9.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.35% | -36.83% | +9.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.63% | -36.83% | -3.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.51% | -57.34% | -0.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.25% | -16.51% | +13.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.85% | -44.41% | -14.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.06% | 7.34% | +2.72% |
Volatility
LINC vs. JBL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) is 11.74%, while Jabil Inc. (JBL) has a volatility of 15.95%. This indicates that LINC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LINC | JBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.74% | 15.95% | -4.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.55% | 33.81% | -1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.33% | 43.40% | +3.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.22% | 38.34% | +5.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.90% | 37.25% | +19.65% |
Dividends
LINC vs. JBL - Dividend Comparison
LINC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JBL Jabil Inc. | 0.10% | 0.14% | 0.22% | 0.25% | 0.47% | 0.45% | 0.75% | 0.77% | 1.29% | 1.22% | 1.35% | 1.37% |
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LINC vs. JBL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and Jabil Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LINC vs. JBL - Profitability Comparison
LINC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 143.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
JBL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Jabil Inc. reported a gross profit of 828.00M and revenue of 8.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.5%.
LINC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported an operating income of 6.41M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
JBL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Jabil Inc. reported an operating income of 445.00M and revenue of 8.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.
LINC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a net income of 4.36M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.
JBL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Jabil Inc. reported a net income of 275.00M and revenue of 8.75B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LINC and JBL have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JBL has higher volatility (15.95%) compared to LINC (11.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LINC dropped -99.11% vs JBL's -94.92%.
LINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LINC and JBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer