LIN vs. PG
LIN (Linde plc) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. LIN operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, LIN returned 11.43%/yr vs 3.37%/yr for PG. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LIN vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIN achieves a 15.92% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 4.71% return.
LIN
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -9.15%
- 6M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 15.92%
- 1Y
- 5.92%
- 3Y*
- 10.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.59%
PG
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- 6M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- 4.71%
- 1Y
- 0.40%
- 3Y*
- 0.76%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- 8.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
LIN Linde plc | $1.22B | $1.09B | $1.18B |
| $1.36B | $1.28B | $1.30B |
LIN vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIN Linde plc | 15.92% | 3.22% | 3.18% | 27.66% | -4.39% | 33.39% | 25.88% | 39.04% | -5.26% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 4.71% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 11.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIN and PG is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018 | 0.37 |
The correlation between LIN and PG shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LIN:
$227.16B
PG:
$348.95B
LIN:
$15.58
PG:
$6.62
LIN:
31.52
PG:
22.19
LIN:
1.57
PG:
7.33
LIN:
6.48
PG:
4.09
LIN:
5.84
PG:
6.55
LIN:
$35.45B
PG:
$87.03B
LIN:
$11.75B
PG:
$43.67B
LIN:
$13.48B
PG:
$21.25B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIN vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
LIN
PG
LIN vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Linde plc (LIN) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIN | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.02 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 0.03 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.84 | 0.04 | +0.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIN vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIN drawdown since its inception was -32.59%, smaller than the maximum PG drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIN and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIN | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.59% | -54.25% | +21.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.18% | -15.52% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.18% | -21.15% | +1.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.82% | -23.77% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.17% | -14.28% | +4.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.40% | -12.17% | +6.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.07% | 9.14% | -2.07% |
Volatility
LIN vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Linde plc (LIN) has a higher volatility of 7.58% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 6.19%. This indicates that LIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIN | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.58% | 6.19% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.38% | 15.74% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.82% | 19.70% | -0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.94% | 18.10% | +2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.08% | 19.19% | +4.89% |
Dividends
LIN vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
LIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than PG's 2.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIN Linde plc | 1.26% | 1.41% | 1.33% | 1.24% | 1.43% | 1.22% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.92% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Financials
LIN vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Linde plc and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LIN vs. PG - Profitability Comparison
LIN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Linde plc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 9.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.28B and revenue of 21.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.5%.
LIN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Linde plc reported an operating income of 2.55B and revenue of 9.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.5%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 3.95B and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.
LIN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Linde plc reported a net income of 1.93B and revenue of 9.29B, resulting in a net margin of 20.8%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 3.00B and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LIN and PG have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIN has higher volatility (7.58%) compared to PG (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIN dropped -32.59% vs PG's -54.25%.
LIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIN and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer