LILA vs. KO
LILA (Liberty Latin America Ltd.) and KO (The Coca-Cola Company) are both stocks. LILA operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while KO operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, LILA returned -11.18%/yr vs 9.59%/yr for KO. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LILA vs. KO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LILA achieves a 30.37% return, which is significantly higher than KO's 16.41% return. Over the past 10 years, LILA has underperformed KO with an annualized return of -11.18%, while KO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.59% annualized return.
LILA
- 1D
- 12.69%
- 1M
- 21.34%
- YTD
- 30.37%
- 6M
- 26.43%
- 1Y
- 67.84%
- 3Y*
- 5.65%
- 5Y*
- -7.69%
- 10Y*
- -11.18%
KO
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 16.41%
- 6M
- 16.48%
- 1Y
- 18.42%
- 3Y*
- 12.75%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
LILA vs. KO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LILA Liberty Latin America Ltd. | 30.37% | 16.19% | -13.00% | -2.92% | -35.42% | 4.76% | -38.81% | 33.29% | -28.14% | -8.24% |
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 16.41% | 15.60% | 8.88% | -4.43% | 10.61% | 11.37% | 2.47% | 20.60% | 6.77% | 14.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between LILA and KO is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2015 | 0.22 |
The correlation between LILA and KO shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LILA:
-$3.32
KO:
$3.18
LILA:
0.20
KO:
7.03
LILA:
$4.44B
KO:
$49.28B
LILA:
$2.25B
KO:
$30.43B
LILA:
$650.40M
KO:
$18.35B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LILA vs. KO — Risk / Return Rank
LILA
KO
LILA vs. KO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liberty Latin America Ltd. (LILA) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LILA | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.20 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 2.35 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.78 | 4.67 | +3.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LILA vs. KO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LILA drawdown since its inception was -90.45%, which is greater than KO's maximum drawdown of -68.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LILA and KO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LILA | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.45% | -68.23% | -22.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.89% | -7.87% | -15.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.06% | -16.26% | -40.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.01% | -17.27% | -51.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.84% | -36.99% | -49.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.56% | -3.30% | -76.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.05% | -16.08% | -51.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.75% | 3.95% | +4.80% |
Volatility
LILA vs. KO - Volatility Comparison
Liberty Latin America Ltd. (LILA) has a higher volatility of 22.61% compared to The Coca-Cola Company (KO) at 6.94%. This indicates that LILA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LILA | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.61% | 6.94% | +15.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.25% | 12.74% | +20.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.70% | 16.74% | +25.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.12% | 16.16% | +28.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.04% | 18.23% | +27.81% |
Dividends
LILA vs. KO - Dividend Comparison
LILA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 2.59% | 2.92% | 3.12% | 3.12% | 2.77% | 2.84% | 2.99% | 2.89% | 3.29% | 3.23% | 3.38% | 3.07% |
LILA Liberty Latin America Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LILA vs. KO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liberty Latin America Ltd. and The Coca-Cola Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LILA vs. KO - Profitability Comparison
LILA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liberty Latin America Ltd. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
KO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a gross profit of 7.85B and revenue of 12.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.
LILA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liberty Latin America Ltd. reported an operating income of 145.20M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.
KO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported an operating income of 4.36B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.
LILA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liberty Latin America Ltd. reported a net income of -22.70M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.
KO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a net income of 3.92B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in a net margin of 31.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LILA and KO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LILA has higher volatility (22.61%) compared to KO (6.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LILA dropped -90.45% vs KO's -68.23%.
LILA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LILA and KO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer