LILA vs. KO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Liberty Latin America Ltd. (LILA) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO).

Performance

LILA vs. KO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Liberty Latin America Ltd. (LILA) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LILA vs. KO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LILA Liberty Latin America Ltd.	16.91%	16.19%	-13.00%	-2.92%	-35.42%	4.76%	-38.81%	33.29%	-28.14%	-8.24%
KO The Coca-Cola Company	9.57%	15.60%	8.88%	-4.43%	10.61%	11.37%	2.47%	20.60%	6.77%	14.38%

Fundamentals

EPS LILA : -$4.18 KO : $3.04
PS Ratio LILA : 0.32 KO : 6.85
Total Revenue (TTM) LILA : $3.58B KO : $47.94B
Gross Profit (TTM) LILA : $2.45B KO : $29.54B
EBITDA (TTM) LILA : $497.30M KO : $18.18B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LILA achieves a 16.91% return, which is significantly higher than KO's 9.57% return. Over the past 10 years, LILA has underperformed KO with an annualized return of -12.52%, while KO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.31% annualized return.

LILA

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 10.20%
• YTD: 16.91%
• 6M: 4.22%
• 1Y: 36.49%
• 3Y*: 1.31%
• 5Y*: -8.18%
• 10Y*: -12.52%

KO

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -4.51%
• YTD: 9.57%
• 6M: 15.52%
• 1Y: 8.93%
• 3Y*: 10.28%
• 5Y*: 10.95%
• 10Y*: 8.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LILA vs. KO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LILA

LILA Risk / Return Rank: 67
LILA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
LILA Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
LILA Omega Ratio Rank: 64
LILA Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
LILA Martin Ratio Rank: 68

KO

KO Risk / Return Rank: 56
KO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
KO Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
KO Omega Ratio Rank: 49
KO Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
KO Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LILA vs. KO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liberty Latin America Ltd. (LILA) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LILA	KO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	0.54	+0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	0.91	+0.46
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.10	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.15	0.95	+0.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.91	1.92	+0.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LILA vs. KO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LILA Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the KO Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LILA and KO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LILA	KO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	0.54	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.19	0.70	-0.89
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.28	0.46	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.32	0.53	-0.85

Correlation

The correlation between LILA and KO is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LILA vs. KO - Dividend Comparison

LILA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LILA Liberty Latin America Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KO The Coca-Cola Company	2.71%	2.92%	3.12%	3.12%	2.77%	2.84%	2.99%	2.89%	3.29%	3.23%	3.38%	3.07%

Drawdowns

LILA vs. KO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LILA drawdown since its inception was -90.45%, which is greater than KO's maximum drawdown of -68.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LILA and KO.

Drawdown Indicators

	LILA	KO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.45%	-68.23%	-22.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.23%	-9.82%	-20.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-69.20%	-17.27%	-51.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-88.40%	-36.99%	-51.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.67%	-6.08%	-75.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.77%	-16.13%	-51.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.90%	4.84%	+7.06%

Volatility

LILA vs. KO - Volatility Comparison

Liberty Latin America Ltd. (LILA) has a higher volatility of 11.19% compared to The Coca-Cola Company (KO) at 4.04%. This indicates that LILA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LILA	KO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.19%	4.04%	+7.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.04%	11.82%	+14.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.08%	16.62%	+25.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.68%	15.76%	+27.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.35%	18.14%	+27.21%

Financials

LILA vs. KO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Liberty Latin America Ltd. and The Coca-Cola Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LILA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Liberty Latin America Ltd. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 301.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

KO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a gross profit of 7.10B and revenue of 11.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.1%.

LILA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Liberty Latin America Ltd. reported an operating income of 125.60M and revenue of 301.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 41.7%.

KO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported an operating income of 3.11B and revenue of 11.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.3%.

LILA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Liberty Latin America Ltd. reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 301.30M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.

KO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a net income of 2.27B and revenue of 11.82B, resulting in a net margin of 19.2%.