PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LI vs. BABA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

LI vs. BABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Li Auto Inc. (LI) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.42%
6.79%
LI
BABA

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LI achieves a -39.62% return, which is significantly lower than BABA's 11.35% return.


LI

YTD

-39.62%

1M

-13.38%

6M

15.42%

1Y

-44.46%

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

BABA

YTD

11.35%

1M

-14.81%

6M

6.82%

1Y

10.77%

5Y (annualized)

-14.11%

10Y (annualized)

-2.61%

Fundamentals


LIBABA
Market Cap$24.58B$209.47B
EPS$1.33$4.86
PE Ratio17.1317.92
PEG Ratio1.500.64
Total Revenue (TTM)$131.86B$708.35B
Gross Profit (TTM)$26.86B$262.37B
EBITDA (TTM)$5.79B$100.28B

Key characteristics


LIBABA
Sharpe Ratio-0.670.29
Sortino Ratio-0.790.71
Omega Ratio0.911.08
Calmar Ratio-0.720.14
Martin Ratio-1.031.08
Ulcer Index43.15%10.04%
Daily Std Dev66.75%36.65%
Max Drawdown-69.02%-80.09%
Current Drawdown-51.55%-72.42%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between LI and BABA is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LI vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Li Auto Inc. (LI) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LI, currently valued at -0.67, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.670.29
The chart of Sortino ratio for LI, currently valued at -0.79, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.790.71
The chart of Omega ratio for LI, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.911.08
The chart of Calmar ratio for LI, currently valued at -0.72, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.720.14
The chart of Martin ratio for LI, currently valued at -1.03, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.031.08
LI
BABA

The current LI Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the BABA Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LI and BABA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.67
0.29
LI
BABA

Dividends

LI vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison

LI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%.


TTM2023
LI
Li Auto Inc.
0.00%0.00%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
1.94%1.29%

Drawdowns

LI vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LI drawdown since its inception was -69.02%, smaller than the maximum BABA drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LI and BABA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-51.55%
-72.42%
LI
BABA

Volatility

LI vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison

Li Auto Inc. (LI) has a higher volatility of 20.77% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) at 9.96%. This indicates that LI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
20.77%
9.96%
LI
BABA

Financials

LI vs. BABA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Li Auto Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items