PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LHX vs. ABT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LHXABT
YTD Return26.21%7.90%
1Y Return45.47%23.99%
3Y Return (Ann)8.22%-1.39%
5Y Return (Ann)7.70%8.63%
10Y Return (Ann)16.35%12.42%
Sharpe Ratio2.591.45
Sortino Ratio3.612.11
Omega Ratio1.461.26
Calmar Ratio1.590.89
Martin Ratio15.993.31
Ulcer Index2.93%7.97%
Daily Std Dev18.05%18.15%
Max Drawdown-65.67%-45.66%
Current Drawdown-0.95%-12.92%

Fundamentals


LHXABT
Market Cap$50.11B$202.58B
EPS$6.31$3.29
PE Ratio41.8735.50
PEG Ratio1.012.27
Total Revenue (TTM)$21.14B$41.22B
Gross Profit (TTM)$5.14B$22.55B
EBITDA (TTM)$3.21B$7.79B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between LHX and ABT is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

LHX vs. ABT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LHX achieves a 26.21% return, which is significantly higher than ABT's 7.90% return. Over the past 10 years, LHX has outperformed ABT with an annualized return of 16.35%, while ABT has yielded a comparatively lower 12.42% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
19.56%
13.08%
LHX
ABT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LHX vs. ABT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LHX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LHX, currently valued at 2.59, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.59
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LHX, currently valued at 3.61, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.61
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LHX, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.46
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LHX, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.59
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LHX, currently valued at 15.99, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0015.99
ABT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ABT, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.45
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ABT, currently valued at 2.11, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.11
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ABT, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ABT, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.89
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ABT, currently valued at 3.31, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.31

LHX vs. ABT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the ABT Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LHX and ABT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.59
1.45
LHX
ABT

Dividends

LHX vs. ABT - Dividend Comparison

LHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than ABT's 1.89% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
1.77%2.17%2.15%1.91%1.80%1.45%1.86%1.55%2.01%2.23%2.48%2.26%
ABT
Abbott Laboratories
1.89%1.85%1.71%1.28%1.32%1.47%1.55%1.86%2.71%2.14%1.95%1.46%

Drawdowns

LHX vs. ABT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LHX drawdown since its inception was -65.67%, which is greater than ABT's maximum drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LHX and ABT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.95%
-12.92%
LHX
ABT

Volatility

LHX vs. ABT - Volatility Comparison

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT) have volatilities of 6.24% and 6.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.24%
6.52%
LHX
ABT

Financials

LHX vs. ABT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between L3Harris Technologies, Inc. and Abbott Laboratories. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items