LGO.TO vs. LGO

In the year-to-date period, LGO.TO achieves a 0.00% return, which is significantly lower than LGO's 2.33% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LGO.TO having a -15.10% annualized return and LGO not far behind at -15.20%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Largo Inc. (LGO.TO) and Largo Resources Ltd (LGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LGO.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is higher than the LGO Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGO.TO and LGO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither LGO.TO nor LGO has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum LGO.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.54%, roughly equal to the maximum LGO drawdown of -99.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGO.TO and LGO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Largo Inc. (LGO.TO) and Largo Resources Ltd (LGO) have volatilities of 21.87% and 22.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Largo Inc. and Largo Resources Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.