PortfoliosLab logo
LGLV vs. VDC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LGLV and VDC is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

LGLV vs. VDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

180.00%200.00%220.00%240.00%260.00%280.00%300.00%320.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
308.29%
207.62%
LGLV
VDC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LGLV:

1.06

VDC:

0.67

Sortino Ratio

LGLV:

1.57

VDC:

1.11

Omega Ratio

LGLV:

1.22

VDC:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

LGLV:

1.44

VDC:

1.05

Martin Ratio

LGLV:

4.98

VDC:

3.36

Ulcer Index

LGLV:

2.93%

VDC:

2.78%

Daily Std Dev

LGLV:

13.25%

VDC:

13.03%

Max Drawdown

LGLV:

-36.64%

VDC:

-34.24%

Current Drawdown

LGLV:

-2.33%

VDC:

-2.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGLV achieves a 4.41% return, which is significantly higher than VDC's 3.82% return. Over the past 10 years, LGLV has outperformed VDC with an annualized return of 11.61%, while VDC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.36% annualized return.


LGLV

YTD

4.41%

1M

3.35%

6M

-0.18%

1Y

13.90%

5Y*

13.93%

10Y*

11.61%

VDC

YTD

3.82%

1M

2.01%

6M

2.12%

1Y

8.65%

5Y*

10.88%

10Y*

8.36%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LGLV vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VDC's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LGLV vs. VDC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGLV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LGLV is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LGLV is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LGLV is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LGLV is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LGLV is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LGLV is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

VDC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VDC is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VDC is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VDC is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VDC is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VDC is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VDC is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LGLV vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LGLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the VDC Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGLV and VDC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.06
0.67
LGLV
VDC

Dividends

LGLV vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison

LGLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than VDC's 2.40% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
1.94%1.93%2.03%1.95%1.65%1.98%1.89%2.09%4.39%2.54%2.97%7.14%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.40%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%1.93%

Drawdowns

LGLV vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGLV drawdown since its inception was -36.64%, which is greater than VDC's maximum drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLV and VDC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-2.33%
-2.96%
LGLV
VDC

Volatility

LGLV vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison

SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) have volatilities of 4.29% and 4.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
4.29%
4.40%
LGLV
VDC