LGLV vs. PSCC
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC).
LGLV and PSCC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LGLV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility (TR). It was launched on Feb 20, 2013. PSCC is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. It was launched on Apr 7, 2010. Both LGLV and PSCC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LGLV or PSCC.
Key characteristics
LGLV | PSCC | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 21.56% | 1.74% |
1Y Return | 31.23% | 16.93% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 8.60% | 3.49% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 11.67% | 11.29% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 11.88% | 9.71% |
Sharpe Ratio | 3.39 | 0.97 |
Sortino Ratio | 4.72 | 1.48 |
Omega Ratio | 1.63 | 1.18 |
Calmar Ratio | 4.26 | 1.34 |
Martin Ratio | 21.06 | 3.47 |
Ulcer Index | 1.45% | 4.79% |
Daily Std Dev | 8.98% | 17.13% |
Max Drawdown | -36.64% | -33.61% |
Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGLV and PSCC is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
LGLV vs. PSCC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LGLV achieves a 21.56% return, which is significantly higher than PSCC's 1.74% return. Over the past 10 years, LGLV has outperformed PSCC with an annualized return of 11.88%, while PSCC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.71% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LGLV vs. PSCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCC's 0.29% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LGLV vs. PSCC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LGLV vs. PSCC - Dividend Comparison
LGLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than PSCC's 1.80% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 1.86% | 2.03% | 1.95% | 1.65% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 2.09% | 4.39% | 2.54% | 2.97% | 7.14% | 2.99% |
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 1.80% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% | 1.60% | 0.42% |
Drawdowns
LGLV vs. PSCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGLV drawdown since its inception was -36.64%, which is greater than PSCC's maximum drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLV and PSCC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LGLV vs. PSCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) is 2.95%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that LGLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.