LGLV vs. PSCC
LGLV (SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) and PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LGLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility (TR), while PSCC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LGLV returned 11.29%/yr vs 6.95%/yr for PSCC. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LGLV charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCC.
Performance
LGLV vs. PSCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGLV achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly lower than PSCC's 13.60% return. Over the past 10 years, LGLV has outperformed PSCC with an annualized return of 11.29%, while PSCC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.95% annualized return.
LGLV
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 5.19%
- 3Y*
- 11.54%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.29%
PSCC
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- 6.59%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- 1.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.40%
- 10Y*
- 6.95%
LGLV vs. PSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 2.78% | 8.37% | 16.22% | 9.19% | -8.17% | 27.95% | 7.42% | 30.83% | 0.32% | 17.84% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 13.60% | -16.47% | 0.98% | 14.83% | -6.66% | 28.82% | 11.17% | 17.39% | -6.72% | 9.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGLV and PSCC is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2013 | 0.56 |
The correlation between LGLV and PSCC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
LGLV vs. PSCC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LGLV
PSCC
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Industrials
LGLV
PSCC
Real Estate
LGLV
PSCC
-
Utilities
LGLV
PSCC
-
Financial Services
LGLV
PSCC
Technology
LGLV
PSCC
-
Consumer Cyclical
LGLV
PSCC
Healthcare
LGLV
PSCC
-
Consumer Defensive
LGLV
PSCC
Communication Services
LGLV
PSCC
-
Energy
LGLV
PSCC
-
Basic Materials
LGLV
PSCC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGLV vs. PSCC — Risk / Return Rank
LGLV
PSCC
LGLV vs. PSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LGLV | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.07 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 0.37 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.80 | 0.64 | +1.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LGLV vs. PSCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGLV drawdown since its inception was -36.64%, which is greater than PSCC's maximum drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLV and PSCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGLV | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.64% | -33.61% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.86% | -15.17% | +8.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.17% | -23.36% | +13.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.49% | -23.36% | +5.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.64% | -33.61% | -3.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.79% | -11.31% | +6.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.22% | -5.99% | +2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 8.69% | -5.79% |
Volatility
LGLV vs. PSCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) is 3.51%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that LGLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGLV | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 5.66% | -2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.00% | 11.53% | -4.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.57% | 16.90% | -7.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.94% | 18.30% | -5.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 19.33% | -3.26% |
LGLV vs. PSCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCC's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGLV vs. PSCC - Dividend Comparison
LGLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than PSCC's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.93% | 2.03% | 1.95% | 1.65% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 2.09% | 4.39% | 2.54% | 2.97% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 1.72% | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LGLV and PSCC have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCC has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to LGLV (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGLV dropped -36.64% vs PSCC's -33.61%.
On 10-year performance, LGLV leads with 11.29% vs 6.95% for PSCC. On fees, LGLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, LGLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, LGLV has performed better with a 11.29% return vs 6.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LGLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCC.
LGLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 1.72% for PSCC.
LGLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while PSCC is Consumer Staples Equities. LGLV tracks SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility (TR), while PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LGLV and 0.29% for PSCC.
LGLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LGLV and PSCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer