LGLIX vs. PJFAX

In the year-to-date period, LGLIX achieves a 46.80% return, which is significantly higher than PJFAX's 28.33% return. Over the past 10 years, LGLIX has outperformed PJFAX with an annualized return of 8.58%, while PJFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.90% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

LGLIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than PJFAX's 0.97% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LGLIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the PJFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGLIX and PJFAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither LGLIX nor PJFAX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum LGLIX drawdown since its inception was -55.73%, smaller than the maximum PJFAX drawdown of -67.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLIX and PJFAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) at 5.18%. This indicates that LGLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.