PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LGLIX vs. PJFAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


LGLIXPJFAX
YTD Return23.26%19.57%
1Y Return36.65%34.13%
3Y Return (Ann)0.04%4.34%
5Y Return (Ann)16.14%17.81%
10Y Return (Ann)14.34%15.06%
Sharpe Ratio1.601.76
Daily Std Dev22.59%19.14%
Max Drawdown-55.73%-64.07%
Current Drawdown-25.67%-5.05%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.01.0

The correlation between LGLIX and PJFAX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

LGLIX vs. PJFAX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LGLIX achieves a 23.26% return, which is significantly higher than PJFAX's 19.57% return. Over the past 10 years, LGLIX has underperformed PJFAX with an annualized return of 14.34%, while PJFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.06% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
4.25%
4.48%
LGLIX
PJFAX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LGLIX vs. PJFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGLIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than PJFAX's 0.97% expense ratio.


PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
Expense ratio chart for PJFAX: current value at 0.97% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.97%
Expense ratio chart for LGLIX: current value at 0.64% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.64%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LGLIX vs. PJFAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGLIX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LGLIX, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.001.60
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LGLIX, currently valued at 2.15, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.16
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LGLIX, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LGLIX, currently valued at 0.72, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.72
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LGLIX, currently valued at 8.59, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.59
PJFAX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PJFAX, currently valued at 1.76, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.001.76
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PJFAX, currently valued at 2.37, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.37
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PJFAX, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PJFAX, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.25
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PJFAX, currently valued at 8.62, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.62

LGLIX vs. PJFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGLIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which roughly equals the PJFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of LGLIX and PJFAX.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.60
1.76
LGLIX
PJFAX

Dividends

LGLIX vs. PJFAX - Dividend Comparison

LGLIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PJFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.05%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LGLIX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%23.83%9.27%9.03%19.82%6.46%0.00%4.84%5.82%6.37%
PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
6.05%7.23%2.77%14.67%9.02%8.14%6.06%5.85%4.12%6.90%5.44%3.60%

Drawdowns

LGLIX vs. PJFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGLIX drawdown since its inception was -55.73%, smaller than the maximum PJFAX drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLIX and PJFAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-25.67%
-5.05%
LGLIX
PJFAX

Volatility

LGLIX vs. PJFAX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) at 6.01%. This indicates that LGLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
7.28%
6.01%
LGLIX
PJFAX