LGLIX vs. PJFAX

In the year-to-date period, LGLIX achieves a -6.58% return, which is significantly lower than PJFAX's -4.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LGLIX having a 14.71% annualized return and PJFAX not far behind at 14.49%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

LGLIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than PJFAX's 0.97% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LGLIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is higher than the PJFAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGLIX and PJFAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither LGLIX nor PJFAX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum LGLIX drawdown since its inception was -45.95%, smaller than the maximum PJFAX drawdown of -67.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLIX and PJFAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.