PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGLIX vs. OIEJX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGLIX vs. OIEJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and JPMorgan Equity Income Fund R6 (OIEJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LGLIX having a 10.47% return and OIEJX slightly lower at 10.42%. Over the past 10 years, LGLIX has outperformed OIEJX with an annualized return of 18.20%, while OIEJX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.35% annualized return.


LGLIX

1D
0.13%
1M
6.80%
YTD
10.47%
6M
9.03%
1Y
26.45%
3Y*
28.69%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*
18.20%

OIEJX

1D
1.04%
1M
2.94%
YTD
10.42%
6M
11.20%
1Y
23.11%
3Y*
18.26%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*
12.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGLIX vs. OIEJX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LGLIX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund
10.47%16.49%44.97%33.29%-38.73%8.62%77.55%35.02%-1.08%31.64%
OIEJX
JPMorgan Equity Income Fund R6
10.42%14.95%19.97%5.05%-1.63%25.41%3.87%26.61%-4.23%17.85%

Correlation

The correlation between LGLIX and OIEJX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2012

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between LGLIX and OIEJX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGLIX vs. OIEJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGLIX
LGLIX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
LGLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
LGLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

OIEJX
OIEJX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
OIEJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OIEJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
OIEJX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
OIEJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
OIEJX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGLIX vs. OIEJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and JPMorgan Equity Income Fund R6 (OIEJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGLIXOIEJXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.42

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

3.38

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.76

12.98

-9.22

LGLIX vs. OIEJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGLIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the OIEJX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGLIX and OIEJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGLIXOIEJXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

2.32

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.77

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.74

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.80

-0.09

Drawdowns

LGLIX vs. OIEJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGLIX drawdown since its inception was -45.95%, which is greater than OIEJX's maximum drawdown of -36.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLIX and OIEJX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGLIXOIEJXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.95%

-36.88%

-9.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.01%

-7.08%

-13.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.25%

-14.16%

-15.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.95%

-14.74%

-31.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.95%

-36.88%

-9.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.34%

-3.01%

-6.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.27%

1.84%

+5.43%

Volatility

LGLIX vs. OIEJX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to JPMorgan Equity Income Fund R6 (OIEJX) at 2.56%. This indicates that LGLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OIEJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGLIXOIEJXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

2.56%

+2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.72%

7.82%

+7.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.07%

10.30%

+10.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.84%

14.30%

+11.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.79%

16.78%

+8.01%

LGLIX vs. OIEJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGLIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than OIEJX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

LGLIX vs. OIEJX - Dividend Comparison

LGLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than OIEJX's 10.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGLIX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund
1.80%1.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%23.83%9.27%8.01%19.82%6.46%0.00%4.84%
OIEJX
JPMorgan Equity Income Fund R6
10.04%11.06%14.67%3.01%3.93%3.57%2.04%3.01%5.37%2.70%2.71%3.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


LGLIX and OIEJX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LGLIX has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to OIEJX (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGLIX dropped -45.95% vs OIEJX's -36.88%.

OIEJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGLIX and OIEJX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer