LGLIX vs. FTRNX

In the year-to-date period, LGLIX achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than FTRNX's -0.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LGLIX having a 15.16% annualized return and FTRNX not far ahead at 15.84%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

LGLIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than FTRNX's 0.73% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and Fidelity Trend Fund (FTRNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LGLIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is higher than the FTRNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGLIX and FTRNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LGLIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTRNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.92%.

The maximum LGLIX drawdown since its inception was -45.95%, smaller than the maximum FTRNX drawdown of -55.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLIX and FTRNX.

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) is 5.95%, while Fidelity Trend Fund (FTRNX) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that LGLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTRNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.