LGH vs. IWY
Compare and contrast key facts about HCM Defender 500 Index ETF (LGH) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY).
LGH and IWY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LGH is a passively managed fund by Howard Capital Management that tracks the performance of the HCM Defender 500 Index. It was launched on Oct 10, 2019. IWY is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 200 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2009. Both LGH and IWY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
LGH vs. IWY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LGH vs. IWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGH HCM Defender 500 Index ETF | -7.73% | 19.47% | 27.00% | 24.19% | -27.37% | 39.92% | 18.51% | 11.06% |
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | -9.30% | 18.19% | 34.89% | 46.49% | -29.91% | 31.05% | 39.01% | 11.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGH achieves a -7.73% return, which is significantly higher than IWY's -9.30% return.
LGH
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- -7.73%
- 6M
- -5.48%
- 1Y
- 18.42%
- 3Y*
- 18.20%
- 5Y*
- 10.08%
- 10Y*
- —
IWY
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -4.60%
- YTD
- -9.30%
- 6M
- -8.67%
- 1Y
- 18.58%
- 3Y*
- 22.41%
- 5Y*
- 13.61%
- 10Y*
- 17.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LGH vs. IWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGH has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than IWY's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LGH vs. IWY — Risk / Return Rank
LGH
IWY
LGH vs. IWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Defender 500 Index ETF (LGH) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGH | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 0.84 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.45 | 1.35 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.19 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 1.17 | +0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.79 | 3.89 | +1.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGH | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 0.84 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.64 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.87 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between LGH and IWY is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LGH vs. IWY - Dividend Comparison
LGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, more than IWY's 0.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGH HCM Defender 500 Index ETF | 0.42% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.63% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.23% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.36% | 0.42% | 0.68% | 0.88% | 0.50% | 0.71% | 1.06% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.58% |
Drawdowns
LGH vs. IWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGH drawdown since its inception was -29.60%, smaller than the maximum IWY drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGH and IWY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGH | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.60% | -32.68% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.29% | -16.63% | +5.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.38% | -32.68% | +3.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.85% | -12.77% | +2.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.57% | -4.77% | -4.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 4.99% | -1.73% |
Volatility
LGH vs. IWY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HCM Defender 500 Index ETF (LGH) is 5.12%, while iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) has a volatility of 6.70%. This indicates that LGH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LGH | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 6.70% | -1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.56% | 12.40% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.03% | 22.29% | -4.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 21.49% | -4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 20.92% | -0.98% |