LFCBY vs. ^GSPC
Compare and contrast key facts about Lifco AB (publ) (LFCBY) and S&P 500 (^GSPC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LFCBY or ^GSPC.
Correlation
The correlation between LFCBY and ^GSPC is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LFCBY vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LFCBY:
1.23
^GSPC:
1.62
LFCBY:
2.12
^GSPC:
2.20
LFCBY:
1.32
^GSPC:
1.30
LFCBY:
3.78
^GSPC:
2.46
LFCBY:
7.52
^GSPC:
10.01
LFCBY:
12.79%
^GSPC:
2.08%
LFCBY:
79.58%
^GSPC:
12.88%
LFCBY:
-25.44%
^GSPC:
-56.78%
LFCBY:
0.00%
^GSPC:
-2.13%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFCBY achieves a 59.84% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 2.24% return.
LFCBY
59.84%
49.92%
54.95%
77.59%
N/A
N/A
^GSPC
2.24%
-1.20%
6.72%
18.21%
12.53%
11.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LFCBY vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
LFCBY
^GSPC
LFCBY vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lifco AB (publ) (LFCBY) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Drawdowns
LFCBY vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFCBY drawdown since its inception was -25.44%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFCBY and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LFCBY vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
Lifco AB (publ) (LFCBY) has a higher volatility of 40.89% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 3.43%. This indicates that LFCBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.