PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEXCX vs. AMAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEXCX vs. AMAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX) and Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares (AMAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LEXCX having a 14.99% return and AMAGX slightly lower at 14.81%. Over the past 10 years, LEXCX has underperformed AMAGX with an annualized return of 11.44%, while AMAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.59% annualized return.


LEXCX

1D
-0.72%
1M
-3.69%
YTD
14.99%
6M
14.68%
1Y
17.81%
3Y*
12.67%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
11.44%

AMAGX

1D
1.65%
1M
1.18%
YTD
14.81%
6M
15.02%
1Y
34.39%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
13.63%
10Y*
17.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEXCX vs. AMAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LEXCX
Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund
14.99%7.04%3.60%14.53%3.95%26.77%4.36%21.43%-5.44%16.61%
AMAGX
Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares
14.81%17.62%15.73%25.67%-19.49%31.51%32.93%33.09%2.47%28.91%

Correlation

The correlation between LEXCX and AMAGX is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 1994

0.67

The correlation between LEXCX and AMAGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEXCX vs. AMAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEXCX
LEXCX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LEXCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEXCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEXCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
LEXCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEXCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

AMAGX
AMAGX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
AMAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEXCX vs. AMAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX) and Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares (AMAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LEXCXAMAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.35

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

3.07

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.85

13.16

-5.31

LEXCX vs. AMAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEXCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the AMAGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEXCX and AMAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LEXCX vs. AMAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEXCX drawdown since its inception was -50.42%, smaller than the maximum AMAGX drawdown of -57.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEXCX and AMAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEXCXAMAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.42%

-57.64%

+7.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.22%

-11.04%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-21.45%

+7.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.75%

-28.09%

+8.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.21%

-28.09%

-11.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.61%

-2.21%

-3.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-10.26%

+3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

2.57%

-0.09%

Volatility

LEXCX vs. AMAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX) is 4.73%, while Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares (AMAGX) has a volatility of 6.35%. This indicates that LEXCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEXCXAMAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

6.35%

-1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.93%

13.88%

-2.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.06%

16.90%

-2.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

18.55%

-2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.01%

18.50%

+0.51%

LEXCX vs. AMAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEXCX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than AMAGX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

LEXCX vs. AMAGX - Dividend Comparison

LEXCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, while AMAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMAGX
Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares
0.00%0.00%3.95%0.65%3.64%0.52%5.44%3.15%3.47%10.90%13.67%7.45%
LEXCX
Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund
1.43%1.65%1.66%1.58%1.65%1.54%1.91%1.86%2.03%1.79%3.93%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


LEXCX and AMAGX have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMAGX has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to LEXCX (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEXCX dropped -50.42% vs AMAGX's -57.64%.

AMAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEXCX and AMAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer