LEU vs. CRT

In the year-to-date period, LEU achieves a 46.85% return, which is significantly higher than CRT's -32.78% return. Over the past 10 years, LEU has outperformed CRT with an annualized return of 30.74%, while CRT has yielded a comparatively lower -0.23% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LEU Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the CRT Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEU and CRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LEU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.76%.

The maximum LEU drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than CRT's maximum drawdown of -83.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEU and CRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) has a higher volatility of 48.71% compared to Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) at 11.56%. This indicates that LEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Centrus Energy Corp. and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.