PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
LEN vs. CSCO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

LEN vs. CSCO

Last updated May 18, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Lennar Corporation (LEN) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO).

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LEN or CSCO.

Correlation

The correlation between LEN and CSCO is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

LEN vs. CSCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lennar Corporation (LEN) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LEN:

-0.91

CSCO:

1.54

Sortino Ratio

LEN:

-1.13

CSCO:

2.10

Omega Ratio

LEN:

0.87

CSCO:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

LEN:

-0.62

CSCO:

1.42

Martin Ratio

LEN:

-1.18

CSCO:

6.43

Ulcer Index

LEN:

23.56%

CSCO:

5.27%

Daily Std Dev

LEN:

32.39%

CSCO:

23.38%

Max Drawdown

LEN:

-94.28%

CSCO:

-89.26%

Current Drawdown

LEN:

-39.29%

CSCO:

-1.27%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LEN:

$29.39B

CSCO:

$255.64B

EPS

LEN:

$13.70

CSCO:

$2.42

PE Ratio

LEN:

8.17

CSCO:

26.29

PEG Ratio

LEN:

1.51

CSCO:

3.00

PS Ratio

LEN:

0.82

CSCO:

4.60

PB Ratio

LEN:

1.28

CSCO:

5.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

LEN:

$35.76B

CSCO:

$55.62B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LEN:

$5.28B

CSCO:

$36.29B

EBITDA (TTM)

LEN:

$4.73B

CSCO:

$10.51B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEN achieves a -14.56% return, which is significantly lower than CSCO's 8.92% return. Over the past 10 years, LEN has underperformed CSCO with an annualized return of 10.18%, while CSCO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.40% annualized return.

LEN

YTD

-14.56%

1M

7.31%

6M

-30.99%

1Y

-29.32%

5Y*

16.98%

10Y*

10.18%

CSCO

YTD

8.92%

1M

14.10%

6M

12.22%

1Y

36.04%

5Y*

10.49%

10Y*

11.40%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LEN vs. CSCO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LEN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LEN is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LEN is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LEN is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LEN is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LEN is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LEN is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
CSCO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CSCO is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CSCO is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CSCO is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CSCO is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CSCO is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CSCO is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LEN vs. CSCO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lennar Corporation (LEN) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LEN Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the CSCO Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEN and CSCO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading data...

Dividends

LEN vs. CSCO - Dividend Comparison

LEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than CSCO's 2.53% yield.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LEN
Lennar Corporation		1.75%1.46%1.00%1.65%0.85%0.81%0.28%0.41%0.25%0.37%0.32%0.35%
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.		2.53%2.69%3.07%3.17%2.32%3.20%2.88%2.95%2.95%3.28%3.02%2.66%

Drawdowns

LEN vs. CSCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEN drawdown since its inception was -94.28%, which is greater than CSCO's maximum drawdown of -89.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEN and CSCO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

LEN vs. CSCO - Volatility Comparison

Lennar Corporation (LEN) has a higher volatility of 8.63% compared to Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) at 6.72%. This indicates that LEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading data...

Financials

LEN vs. CSCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lennar Corporation and Cisco Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B16.00B20212022202320242025
7.63B
14.15B
(LEN) Total Revenue
(CSCO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LEN vs. CSCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lennar Corporation and Cisco Systems, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual
20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
11.3%
65.6%
(LEN) Gross Margin
(CSCO) Gross Margin
LEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lennar Corporation reported a gross profit of 861.05M and revenue of 7.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.3%.

CSCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 9.28B and revenue of 14.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.6%.

LEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lennar Corporation reported an operating income of 713.67M and revenue of 7.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

CSCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.20B and revenue of 14.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.6%.

LEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lennar Corporation reported a net income of 519.53M and revenue of 7.63B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.

CSCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 2.49B and revenue of 14.15B, resulting in a net margin of 17.6%.