PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEGR vs. FBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEGR vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEGR achieves a 9.61% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -25.83% return.


LEGR

1D
0.17%
1M
-2.61%
6M
6.06%
YTD
9.61%
1Y
22.57%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*

FBTC

1D
0.57%
1M
-2.45%
6M
-33.58%
YTD
-25.83%
1Y
-44.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEGR vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LEGR
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF
9.61%30.83%17.83%
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
-25.83%-6.56%94.28%

Correlation

The correlation between LEGR and FBTC is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEGR vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEGR
LEGR Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
LEGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEGR Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LEGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEGR Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTC
FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEGR vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LEGRFBTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.84

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

-0.83

+3.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.44

-1.35

+8.78

LEGR vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEGR Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEGR and FBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LEGR vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEGR drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum FBTC drawdown of -53.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEGR and FBTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEGRFBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.12%

-53.35%

+17.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-53.35%

+42.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.94%

-48.34%

+44.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-17.59%

+11.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

32.96%

-29.92%

Volatility

LEGR vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) is 3.97%, while Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a volatility of 11.73%. This indicates that LEGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEGRFBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

11.73%

-7.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.39%

34.92%

-22.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.48%

44.34%

-29.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.09%

49.82%

-32.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.28%

49.82%

-29.54%

LEGR vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEGR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

LEGR vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

LEGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LEGR
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF
1.82%1.84%2.40%2.56%2.64%1.80%0.95%2.04%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


LEGR and FBTC have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBTC has higher volatility (11.73%) compared to LEGR (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEGR dropped -36.12% vs FBTC's -53.35%.

On 1-year performance, LEGR leads with 22.57% vs -44.37% for FBTC. On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, LEGR has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LEGR has performed better with a 22.57% return vs -44.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LEGR.

LEGR has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.

LEGR is categorized as Blockchain, while FBTC is Cryptocurrency. LEGR tracks Indxx Blockchain Index, while FBTC tracks Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LEGR and 0.25% for FBTC.

LEGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEGR and FBTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer