PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEGR vs. FBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEGR vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEGR achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -25.34% return.


LEGR

1D
-1.50%
1M
7.23%
YTD
12.39%
6M
15.64%
1Y
30.64%
3Y*
23.83%
5Y*
11.82%
10Y*

FBTC

1D
-2.65%
1M
-18.37%
YTD
-25.34%
6M
-29.78%
1Y
-38.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEGR vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LEGR
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF
12.39%30.83%18.25%
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
-25.34%-6.56%99.56%

Correlation

The correlation between LEGR and FBTC is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEGR vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEGR
LEGR Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
LEGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEGR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
LEGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEGR Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTC
FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEGR vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LEGRFBTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.86

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

-0.79

+3.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.21

-1.36

+12.57

LEGR vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEGR Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEGR and FBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LEGRFBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

-0.89

+3.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.30

+0.30

Drawdowns

LEGR vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEGR drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum FBTC drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEGR and FBTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEGRFBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.12%

-49.33%

+13.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-49.33%

+38.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-48.00%

+46.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.61%

-16.01%

+9.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

28.41%

-25.67%

Volatility

LEGR vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) is 4.93%, while Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a volatility of 9.39%. This indicates that LEGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEGRFBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

9.39%

-4.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.22%

34.38%

-23.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.62%

43.61%

-29.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.96%

50.13%

-33.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

50.13%

-29.82%

LEGR vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEGR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

LEGR vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

LEGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LEGR
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF
1.67%1.84%2.40%2.56%2.64%1.80%0.95%2.04%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


LEGR and FBTC have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBTC has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to LEGR (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEGR dropped -36.12% vs FBTC's -49.33%.

On 1-year performance, LEGR leads with 30.64% vs -38.65% for FBTC. On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, LEGR has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LEGR has performed better with a 30.64% return vs -38.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LEGR.

LEGR has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.

LEGR is categorized as Blockchain, while FBTC is Cryptocurrency. LEGR tracks Indxx Blockchain Index, while FBTC tracks Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LEGR and 0.25% for FBTC.

LEGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEGR and FBTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer