LEAD vs. QYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD).
LEAD and QYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LEAD is a passively managed fund by SRN Advisors that tracks the performance of the Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend Index. It was launched on Jan 6, 2016. QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013. Both LEAD and QYLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LEAD or QYLD.
Correlation
The correlation between LEAD and QYLD is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LEAD vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LEAD:
0.77
QYLD:
1.81
LEAD:
1.15
QYLD:
2.48
LEAD:
1.14
QYLD:
1.42
LEAD:
1.36
QYLD:
2.50
LEAD:
3.16
QYLD:
13.25
LEAD:
3.24%
QYLD:
1.46%
LEAD:
13.27%
QYLD:
10.75%
LEAD:
-32.19%
QYLD:
-24.75%
LEAD:
-3.36%
QYLD:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEAD achieves a 3.50% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 4.24% return.
LEAD
3.50%
0.61%
3.84%
10.10%
12.16%
N/A
QYLD
4.24%
2.22%
11.86%
19.98%
7.58%
8.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LEAD vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEAD has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LEAD vs. QYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
LEAD
QYLD
LEAD vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LEAD vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
LEAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than QYLD's 12.16% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEAD Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF | 0.89% | 0.93% | 1.13% | 1.27% | 1.78% | 0.81% | 1.32% | 1.39% | 0.97% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.22% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% | 10.74% |
Drawdowns
LEAD vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEAD drawdown since its inception was -32.19%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEAD and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LEAD vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 2.31%. This indicates that LEAD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.