LEAD vs. DGRW
Compare and contrast key facts about Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) and WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW).
LEAD and DGRW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LEAD is a passively managed fund by SRN Advisors that tracks the performance of the Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend Index. It was launched on Jan 6, 2016. DGRW is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on May 22, 2013. Both LEAD and DGRW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LEAD or DGRW.
Correlation
The correlation between LEAD and DGRW is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LEAD vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LEAD:
0.03
DGRW:
0.35
LEAD:
0.18
DGRW:
0.60
LEAD:
1.02
DGRW:
1.09
LEAD:
0.03
DGRW:
0.34
LEAD:
0.14
DGRW:
1.54
LEAD:
4.44%
DGRW:
3.55%
LEAD:
17.59%
DGRW:
15.78%
LEAD:
-32.19%
DGRW:
-32.04%
LEAD:
-11.38%
DGRW:
-10.24%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LEAD having a -5.09% return and DGRW slightly lower at -5.34%.
LEAD
-5.09%
-2.82%
-9.67%
1.54%
13.35%
N/A
DGRW
-5.34%
-3.44%
-8.50%
6.30%
14.95%
11.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LEAD vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEAD has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LEAD vs. DGRW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
LEAD
DGRW
LEAD vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) and WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LEAD vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison
LEAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than DGRW's 1.66% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEAD Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF | 0.95% | 0.93% | 1.13% | 1.27% | 1.78% | 0.81% | 1.32% | 1.39% | 0.97% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Fund | 1.66% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.78% | 1.91% | 2.20% | 2.42% | 1.73% | 2.13% | 2.18% | 1.79% |
Drawdowns
LEAD vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEAD drawdown since its inception was -32.19%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRW drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEAD and DGRW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LEAD vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) and WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) have volatilities of 11.70% and 11.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.