LDUR vs. CDX
LDUR (PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF) and CDX (Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LDUR is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO, while CDX is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, LDUR returned 5.11%/yr vs 7.17%/yr for CDX. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LDUR charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for CDX.
Performance
LDUR vs. CDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDUR achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly higher than CDX's -2.44% return.
LDUR
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 4.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 2.23%
- 10Y*
- 2.43%
CDX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -2.70%
- 1Y
- -1.77%
- 3Y*
- 7.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LDUR vs. CDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDUR PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF | 0.91% | 5.76% | 5.14% | 4.78% | -2.89% |
CDX Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF | -2.44% | 9.51% | 7.71% | 12.74% | -8.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDUR and CDX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2022 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDUR vs. CDX — Risk / Return Rank
LDUR
CDX
LDUR vs. CDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR) and Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LDUR | CDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 0.95 | +0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.70 | -0.43 | +5.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.64 | -1.00 | +23.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LDUR | CDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.83 | -0.31 | +3.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.38 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
LDUR vs. CDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDUR drawdown since its inception was -8.68%, smaller than the maximum CDX drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDUR and CDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDUR | CDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.68% | -13.24% | +4.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.93% | -4.18% | +3.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.17% | -8.88% | +7.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -7.41% | +7.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.85% | -4.34% | +3.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.19% | 1.77% | -1.58% |
Volatility
LDUR vs. CDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR) is 0.44%, while Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX) has a volatility of 1.61%. This indicates that LDUR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDUR | CDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.44% | 1.61% | -1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.08% | 4.72% | -3.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55% | 5.69% | -4.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.03% | 11.10% | -9.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.77% | 11.10% | -8.33% |
LDUR vs. CDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDUR has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than CDX's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDUR vs. CDX - Dividend Comparison
LDUR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, less than CDX's 8.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDX Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF | 8.37% | 7.18% | 12.60% | 5.26% | 7.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDUR PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF | 4.35% | 4.60% | 4.77% | 4.11% | 2.22% | 0.90% | 2.15% | 3.14% | 2.66% | 2.08% | 1.85% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDUR and CDX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDX has higher volatility (1.61%) compared to LDUR (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDUR dropped -8.68% vs CDX's -13.24%.
On 3-year performance, CDX leads with 7.17% vs 5.11% for LDUR. On fees, CDX is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, LDUR has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CDX has performed better with a 7.17% return vs 5.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CDX is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for LDUR.
CDX has the higher dividend yield at 8.37%, compared with 4.35% for LDUR.
LDUR is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while CDX is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for LDUR and 0.26% for CDX.
LDUR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LDUR and CDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer