LCWL.L vs. SWLD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor Core MSCI World (DR) UCITS ETF (LCWL.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L).
LCWL.L and SWLD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LCWL.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Feb 28, 2018. SWLD.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Feb 28, 2019. Both LCWL.L and SWLD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LCWL.L or SWLD.L.
Performance
LCWL.L vs. SWLD.L - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LCWL.L having a 19.77% return and SWLD.L slightly lower at 19.63%.
LCWL.L
19.77%
2.64%
8.64%
24.71%
12.44%
N/A
SWLD.L
19.63%
2.65%
8.45%
0.62%
12.52%
N/A
Key characteristics
| LCWL.L | SWLD.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.44 | 2.45 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.41 | 3.44 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.47 | 1.47 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.24 | 1.23 |
| Martin Ratio | 17.19 | 17.24 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.44% | 1.43% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.11% | 32.33% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.69% | -32.06% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.53% | -0.91% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCWL.L vs. SWLD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LCWL.L and SWLD.L have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between LCWL.L and SWLD.L is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LCWL.L vs. SWLD.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core MSCI World (DR) UCITS ETF (LCWL.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LCWL.L vs. SWLD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LCWL.L nor SWLD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
LCWL.L vs. SWLD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCWL.L drawdown since its inception was -25.69%, smaller than the maximum SWLD.L drawdown of -32.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCWL.L and SWLD.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LCWL.L vs. SWLD.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor Core MSCI World (DR) UCITS ETF (LCWL.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L) have volatilities of 3.13% and 3.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.