LCWD.L vs. SWRD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor Core MSCI World (DR) UCITS ETF (LCWD.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L).
LCWD.L and SWRD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LCWD.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Feb 28, 2018. SWRD.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Feb 28, 2019. Both LCWD.L and SWRD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LCWD.L or SWRD.L.
Key characteristics
| LCWD.L | SWRD.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 20.15% | 20.39% |
| 1Y Return | 31.47% | 31.85% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.98% | 7.30% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.46% | 12.64% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.52 | 2.57 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.50 | 3.57 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.47 | 1.47 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.46 | 3.54 |
| Martin Ratio | 16.25 | 16.53 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.77% | 1.76% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.57% | 11.47% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.16% | -34.10% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.71% | -0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCWD.L and SWRD.L is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LCWD.L vs. SWRD.L - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LCWD.L having a 20.15% return and SWRD.L slightly higher at 20.39%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCWD.L vs. SWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LCWD.L and SWRD.L have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LCWD.L vs. SWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core MSCI World (DR) UCITS ETF (LCWD.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LCWD.L vs. SWRD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LCWD.L nor SWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
LCWD.L vs. SWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCWD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.16%, roughly equal to the maximum SWRD.L drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCWD.L and SWRD.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LCWD.L vs. SWRD.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor Core MSCI World (DR) UCITS ETF (LCWD.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) have volatilities of 3.19% and 3.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.