LCTD vs. VDC
LCTD (BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF) and VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LCTD is a Alternative Energy Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while VDC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. LCTD is actively managed, while VDC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LCTD returned 6.71%/yr vs 7.15%/yr for VDC. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCTD charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDC.
Performance
LCTD vs. VDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCTD achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly lower than VDC's 9.12% return.
LCTD
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- 5.69%
- 6M
- 5.13%
- 1Y
- 17.45%
- 3Y*
- 14.97%
- 5Y*
- 6.71%
- 10Y*
- —
VDC
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 9.12%
- 6M
- 8.41%
- 1Y
- 5.88%
- 3Y*
- 8.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
LCTD vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF | 5.69% | 30.42% | 3.14% | 17.10% | -16.16% | 4.48% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 9.12% | 2.17% | 13.30% | 2.38% | -1.79% | 13.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCTD and VDC is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2021 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LCTD and VDC has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
LCTD vs. VDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LCTD
VDC
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Technology
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
LCTD
VDC
-
Industrials
LCTD
VDC
Technology
LCTD
VDC
-
Healthcare
LCTD
VDC
Consumer Cyclical
LCTD
VDC
Basic Materials
LCTD
VDC
Consumer Defensive
LCTD
VDC
Energy
LCTD
VDC
-
Communication Services
LCTD
VDC
-
Utilities
LCTD
VDC
-
Real Estate
LCTD
VDC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCTD vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank
LCTD
VDC
LCTD vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCTD | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.09 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 0.64 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.62 | 1.26 | +4.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCTD vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCTD drawdown since its inception was -29.82%, smaller than the maximum VDC drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTD and VDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCTD | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.82% | -34.24% | +4.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.92% | -9.28% | -1.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.59% | -11.78% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.82% | -16.55% | -13.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.82% | -5.61% | +1.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.75% | -3.73% | -3.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 4.68% | -1.56% |
Volatility
LCTD vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) is 4.65%, while Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that LCTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCTD | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 5.04% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.59% | 10.32% | +2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.97% | 12.72% | +2.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 13.20% | +3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 14.67% | +1.41% |
LCTD vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCTD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VDC's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LCTD vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison
LCTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than VDC's 2.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF | 3.44% | 3.61% | 3.74% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 2.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 2.10% | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.65% | 2.37% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 2.44% | 2.78% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCTD and VDC have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VDC has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to LCTD (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCTD dropped -29.82% vs VDC's -34.24%.
On 5-year performance, VDC leads with 7.15% vs 6.71% for LCTD. On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, LCTD has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VDC has performed better with a 7.15% return vs 6.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for LCTD.
LCTD has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 2.10% for VDC.
LCTD is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while VDC is Consumer Staples Equities. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LCTD and 0.09% for VDC.
LCTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCTD and VDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer