LCSSX vs. XMHQ
Compare and contrast key facts about ClearBridge Select Fund (LCSSX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ).
LCSSX is managed by Legg Mason. It was launched on Nov 30, 2012. XMHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006.
Performance
LCSSX vs. XMHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LCSSX vs. XMHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCSSX ClearBridge Select Fund | -10.67% | 7.26% | 21.54% | 24.25% | -33.06% | 20.27% | 58.86% | 33.60% | 10.56% | 39.04% |
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 1.08% | 4.71% | 16.79% | 29.51% | -12.42% | 20.98% | 26.61% | 27.18% | -9.08% | 15.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCSSX achieves a -10.67% return, which is significantly lower than XMHQ's 1.08% return. Over the past 10 years, LCSSX has outperformed XMHQ with an annualized return of 15.67%, while XMHQ has yielded a comparatively lower 12.42% annualized return.
LCSSX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -8.33%
- YTD
- -10.67%
- 6M
- -12.76%
- 1Y
- 5.24%
- 3Y*
- 10.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.92%
- 10Y*
- 15.67%
XMHQ
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -4.48%
- YTD
- 1.08%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- 13.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCSSX vs. XMHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCSSX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XMHQ's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LCSSX vs. XMHQ — Risk / Return Rank
LCSSX
XMHQ
LCSSX vs. XMHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Select Fund (LCSSX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCSSX | XMHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.25 | 0.68 | -0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 1.14 | -0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.14 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 1.09 | -0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.71 | 3.97 | -3.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCSSX | XMHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | 0.68 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.39 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.60 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.43 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between LCSSX and XMHQ is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LCSSX vs. XMHQ - Dividend Comparison
LCSSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCSSX ClearBridge Select Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 3.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.28% | 2.11% | 1.12% | 5.25% |
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 0.60% | 0.64% | 5.20% | 0.73% | 1.72% | 1.00% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 1.63% | 1.34% |
Drawdowns
LCSSX vs. XMHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCSSX drawdown since its inception was -43.46%, smaller than the maximum XMHQ drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCSSX and XMHQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCSSX | XMHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.46% | -58.19% | +14.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.24% | -12.54% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.46% | -25.47% | -17.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.46% | -36.90% | -6.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.24% | -5.36% | -8.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.26% | -9.35% | +0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.34% | 3.43% | +0.91% |
Volatility
LCSSX vs. XMHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ClearBridge Select Fund (LCSSX) is 5.54%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that LCSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LCSSX | XMHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 6.03% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.39% | 11.37% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.32% | 20.26% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.82% | 20.76% | +1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.91% | 20.69% | +1.22% |