LCID vs. ROKU

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LCID (Lucid Group, Inc.) and ROKU (Roku, Inc.) are both stocks. LCID operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while ROKU operates in Entertainment (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, LCID returned -50.04%/yr vs -19.48%/yr for ROKU. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

LCID vs. ROKU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and Roku, Inc. (ROKU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCID achieves a -30.18% return, which is significantly lower than ROKU's 33.66% return.

LCID

• 1D: -9.11%
• 1M: 21.38%
• 6M: -33.33%
• YTD: -30.18%
• 1Y: -69.50%
• 3Y*: -53.35%
• 5Y*: -50.04%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -50.57%

ROKU

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 1.81%
• 6M: 52.32%
• YTD: 33.66%
• 1Y: 81.31%
• 3Y*: 14.15%
• 5Y*: -19.48%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 28.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LCID Lucid Group, Inc.	$115.94M	$157.91M	$114.99M
ROKU Roku, Inc.	$351.29M	$393.75M	$580.85M

LCID vs. ROKU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LCID Lucid Group, Inc.	-30.18%	-65.00%	-28.27%	-38.36%	-82.05%	50.75%
ROKU Roku, Inc.	33.66%	45.94%	-18.90%	125.21%	-82.16%	-51.82%

Correlation

The correlation between LCID and ROKU is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021	0.43

The correlation between LCID and ROKU shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap LCID : $2.35B ROKU : $21.51B
EPS LCID : -$2.58 ROKU : $1.33
PS Ratio LCID : 8.59 ROKU : 4.42
Total Revenue (TTM) LCID : $1.12B ROKU : $4.97B
Gross Profit (TTM) LCID : -$1.62B ROKU : $2.19B
EBITDA (TTM) LCID : -$3.03B ROKU : $280.30M

Return for Risk

LCID vs. ROKU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LCID

LCID Risk / Return Rank: 9
LCID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
LCID Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
LCID Omega Ratio Rank: 9
LCID Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
LCID Martin Ratio Rank: 13

ROKU

ROKU Risk / Return Rank: 78
ROKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
ROKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
ROKU Omega Ratio Rank: 76
ROKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ROKU Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LCID vs. ROKU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and Roku, Inc. (ROKU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LCID	ROKU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.84	1.16	-2.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.55	1.82	-3.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	1.24	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	1.96	-2.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.26	5.65	-6.91

LCID vs. ROKU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCID Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the ROKU Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCID and ROKU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LCID vs. ROKU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCID drawdown since its inception was -99.17%, which is greater than ROKU's maximum drawdown of -91.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCID and ROKU.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCID	ROKU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.17%	-91.91%	-7.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-81.35%	-27.69%	-53.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-93.57%	-51.65%	-41.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.17%	-90.77%	-8.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.67%	-69.76%	-28.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.03%	-53.10%	-27.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	55.44%	9.83%	+45.61%

Volatility

LCID vs. ROKU - Volatility Comparison

Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) has a higher volatility of 46.74% compared to Roku, Inc. (ROKU) at 3.43%. This indicates that LCID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROKU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCID	ROKU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	46.74%	3.43%	+43.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	67.53%	34.40%	+33.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	83.68%	46.83%	+36.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	84.06%	66.52%	+17.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	84.02%	74.91%	+9.11%

Dividends

LCID vs. ROKU - Dividend Comparison

Neither LCID nor ROKU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCID and ROKU in my portfolio?

LCID and ROKU have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCID or ROKU?

LCID has higher volatility (46.74%) compared to ROKU (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCID dropped -99.17% vs ROKU's -91.91%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROKU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.