LCID vs. MSTR
LCID (Lucid Group, Inc.) and MSTR (Strategy Inc) are both stocks. LCID operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while MSTR operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 5 years, LCID returned -52.62%/yr vs 21.16%/yr for MSTR. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LCID vs. MSTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCID achieves a -45.88% return, which is significantly lower than MSTR's -16.72% return.
LCID
- 1D
- -7.29%
- 1M
- -14.50%
- YTD
- -45.88%
- 6M
- -57.82%
- 1Y
- -73.88%
- 3Y*
- -55.75%
- 5Y*
- -52.62%
- 10Y*
- —
MSTR
- 1D
- -7.01%
- 1M
- -31.15%
- YTD
- -16.72%
- 6M
- -32.83%
- 1Y
- -67.34%
- 3Y*
- 61.19%
- 5Y*
- 21.16%
- 10Y*
- 20.96%
LCID vs. MSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCID Lucid Group, Inc. | -45.88% | -65.00% | -28.27% | -38.36% | -82.05% | 280.12% | 1.21% |
MSTR Strategy Inc | -16.72% | -47.53% | 358.54% | 346.15% | -74.00% | 40.13% | 143.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCID and MSTR is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2020 | 0.36 |
The correlation between LCID and MSTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LCID:
$18.78B
MSTR:
$42.26B
LCID:
-$3.19
MSTR:
-$40.19
LCID:
5.39
MSTR:
79.33
LCID:
$1.12B
MSTR:
$490.47M
LCID:
-$1.62B
MSTR:
$334.08M
LCID:
-$3.03B
MSTR:
$466.93M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCID vs. MSTR — Risk / Return Rank
LCID
MSTR
LCID vs. MSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and Strategy Inc (MSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCID | MSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 0.81 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | -0.88 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | -1.31 | -0.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCID | MSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.97 | -0.96 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.65 | 0.23 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.45 | 0.12 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
LCID vs. MSTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCID drawdown since its inception was -99.03%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTR drawdown of -99.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCID and MSTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCID | MSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.03% | -99.86% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.08% | -76.53% | -5.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -93.09% | -77.42% | -15.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.99% | -84.11% | -14.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.01% | -73.29% | -25.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.00% | -86.48% | +10.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 54.65% | 51.59% | +3.06% |
Volatility
LCID vs. MSTR - Volatility Comparison
Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and Strategy Inc (MSTR) have volatilities of 18.88% and 19.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCID | MSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.88% | 19.43% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.48% | 56.49% | -6.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.33% | 70.30% | +6.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.56% | 90.79% | -9.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 86.78% | 73.70% | +13.08% |
Dividends
LCID vs. MSTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither LCID nor MSTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LCID vs. MSTR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lucid Group, Inc. and Strategy Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LCID and MSTR have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTR has higher volatility (19.43%) compared to LCID (18.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCID dropped -99.03% vs MSTR's -99.86%.
MSTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.96 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCID and MSTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer