PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCID vs. MSTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LCID vs. MSTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and Strategy Inc (MSTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCID achieves a -45.88% return, which is significantly lower than MSTR's -16.72% return.


LCID

1D
-7.29%
1M
-14.50%
YTD
-45.88%
6M
-57.82%
1Y
-73.88%
3Y*
-55.75%
5Y*
-52.62%
10Y*

MSTR

1D
-7.01%
1M
-31.15%
YTD
-16.72%
6M
-32.83%
1Y
-67.34%
3Y*
61.19%
5Y*
21.16%
10Y*
20.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCID vs. MSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LCID
Lucid Group, Inc.
-45.88%-65.00%-28.27%-38.36%-82.05%280.12%1.21%
MSTR
Strategy Inc
-16.72%-47.53%358.54%346.15%-74.00%40.13%143.47%

Correlation

The correlation between LCID and MSTR is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2020

0.36

The correlation between LCID and MSTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LCID:

$18.78B

MSTR:

$42.26B

EPS

LCID:

-$3.19

MSTR:

-$40.19

PS Ratio

LCID:

5.39

MSTR:

79.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

LCID:

$1.12B

MSTR:

$490.47M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LCID:

-$1.62B

MSTR:

$334.08M

EBITDA (TTM)

LCID:

-$3.03B

MSTR:

$466.93M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCID vs. MSTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCID
LCID Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
LCID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCID Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCID Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
LCID Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCID Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTR
MSTR Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
MSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCID vs. MSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and Strategy Inc (MSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCIDMSTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

0.81

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

-0.88

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.35

-1.31

-0.05

LCID vs. MSTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCID Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is comparable to the MSTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCID and MSTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCIDMSTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.97

-0.96

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.65

0.23

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.45

0.12

-0.58

Drawdowns

LCID vs. MSTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCID drawdown since its inception was -99.03%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTR drawdown of -99.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCID and MSTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCIDMSTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.03%

-99.86%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.08%

-76.53%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-93.09%

-77.42%

-15.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.99%

-84.11%

-14.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.01%

-73.29%

-25.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.00%

-86.48%

+10.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

54.65%

51.59%

+3.06%

Volatility

LCID vs. MSTR - Volatility Comparison

Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and Strategy Inc (MSTR) have volatilities of 18.88% and 19.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCIDMSTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.88%

19.43%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.48%

56.49%

-6.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.33%

70.30%

+6.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.56%

90.79%

-9.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

86.78%

73.70%

+13.08%

Dividends

LCID vs. MSTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither LCID nor MSTR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LCID vs. MSTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lucid Group, Inc. and Strategy Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M202220232024202520260
124.30M
(LCID) Total Revenue
(MSTR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LCID and MSTR have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTR has higher volatility (19.43%) compared to LCID (18.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCID dropped -99.03% vs MSTR's -99.86%.

MSTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.96 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCID and MSTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer