PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LBRT vs. LRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LBRT vs. LRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Liberty Oilfield Services Inc. (LBRT) and Stride, Inc. (LRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBRT achieves a 68.80% return, which is significantly higher than LRN's 53.44% return.


LBRT

1D
-0.61%
1M
-8.46%
YTD
68.80%
6M
63.23%
1Y
152.69%
3Y*
35.38%
5Y*
13.49%
10Y*

LRN

1D
1.76%
1M
7.99%
YTD
53.44%
6M
62.77%
1Y
-30.11%
3Y*
33.48%
5Y*
28.19%
10Y*
23.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBRT vs. LRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LBRT
Liberty Oilfield Services Inc.
68.80%-4.91%11.23%14.83%65.57%-5.92%-6.51%-12.62%-40.12%
LRN
Stride, Inc.
53.44%-37.53%75.05%89.80%-6.15%56.99%4.32%-17.91%50.15%

Correlation

The correlation between LBRT and LRN is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2018

0.15

The correlation between LBRT and LRN shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LBRT:

$5.16B

LRN:

$4.74B

EPS

LBRT:

$0.91

LRN:

$9.68

PE Ratio

LBRT:

34.18

LRN:

10.29

PEG Ratio

LBRT:

2.05

LRN:

0.26

PS Ratio

LBRT:

1.27

LRN:

1.90

PB Ratio

LBRT:

2.65

LRN:

2.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

LBRT:

$4.05B

LRN:

$2.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LBRT:

$433.12M

LRN:

$972.24M

EBITDA (TTM)

LBRT:

$688.45M

LRN:

$424.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LBRT vs. LRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBRT
LBRT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
LBRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBRT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
LBRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

LRN
LRN Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
LRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRN Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
LRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRN Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBRT vs. LRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liberty Oilfield Services Inc. (LBRT) and Stride, Inc. (LRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LBRTLRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

0.98

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.87

-0.47

+6.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.46

-0.73

+15.19

LBRT vs. LRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBRT Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the LRN Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBRT and LRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LBRTLRNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

-0.45

+2.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.55

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.15

-0.07

Drawdowns

LBRT vs. LRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBRT drawdown since its inception was -90.02%, which is greater than LRN's maximum drawdown of -81.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBRT and LRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LBRTLRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.02%

-81.41%

-8.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.19%

-64.07%

+37.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.84%

-64.07%

+5.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.84%

-64.07%

+5.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.46%

-41.33%

+32.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.67%

-36.27%

+0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.61%

41.53%

-30.92%

Volatility

LBRT vs. LRN - Volatility Comparison

Liberty Oilfield Services Inc. (LBRT) has a higher volatility of 12.09% compared to Stride, Inc. (LRN) at 7.85%. This indicates that LBRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LBRTLRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.09%

7.85%

+4.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.66%

23.81%

+12.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.19%

67.31%

-5.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.94%

51.38%

+3.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.78%

49.23%

+15.55%

Dividends

LBRT vs. LRN - Dividend Comparison

LBRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, while LRN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
LBRT
Liberty Oilfield Services Inc.
1.09%1.79%1.46%1.21%0.31%0.00%0.48%1.80%0.77%
LRN
Stride, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LBRT vs. LRN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liberty Oilfield Services Inc. and Stride, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
1.02B
629.87M
(LBRT) Total Revenue
(LRN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LBRT vs. LRN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Liberty Oilfield Services Inc. and Stride, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
6.2%
36.8%
Portfolio components
LBRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liberty Oilfield Services Inc. reported a gross profit of 63.31M and revenue of 1.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.2%.

LRN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a gross profit of 231.56M and revenue of 629.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

LBRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liberty Oilfield Services Inc. reported an operating income of 3.77M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.4%.

LRN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported an operating income of 129.08M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.

LBRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liberty Oilfield Services Inc. reported a net income of 22.56M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.

LRN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a net income of 248.49M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LBRT and LRN have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LBRT has higher volatility (12.09%) compared to LRN (7.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBRT dropped -90.02% vs LRN's -81.41%.

LBRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LBRT and LRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer